- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Serviceguard Clustering versus WebLogic Clustering...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-22-2006 02:25 AM
тАО01-22-2006 02:25 AM
We run WebLogic 7.1's clustering feature for our web applications. I am thinking to recommend MC Serviceguard for High Available solution in addition to WebLogic Clustering.
Someone has raised questions what are advantages of MCSG clustering in addition to WebLogic clustering.
Can anyone suggest advantages ?
Regards,
Shiv
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-22-2006 03:05 AM
тАО01-22-2006 03:05 AM
SolutionWeblogic Cluster - Normally goes as N+1 setup. Which would be used for load balancing and failover.
Cluster supports only the following software services e.g. servlet/HTTP etc.
If the weblogic server fails automatically starts the instance on the next server.
As you have many servers running the instance you don't need a MCSG.
As Weblogic services are not interupter during such failures SG is not needed.
Chan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-22-2006 03:15 PM
тАО01-22-2006 03:15 PM
Re: Serviceguard Clustering versus WebLogic Clustering for Web Applications
Weblogic clustering is application level clustering where as two or more instances are coupled together to provide load balancing, failover, etc.. whereas, Serviceguard is system level clustering where you share resources of OS.
-Arun
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-22-2006 04:28 PM
тАО01-22-2006 04:28 PM
Re: Serviceguard Clustering versus WebLogic Clustering for Web Applications
MCSG is High Availabilty cluster software which provides HA at host level for clustered resources. The HA is achieved by providing redundancy and failover of the cluster resources at host level. The clustered resources ranges from a network card,application failure ( mind these application doesn't have their own capability to failover) etc to complete host failure. It does provide application monitoring through scripting to provide application failover to another host.
Weblogic Clustering is application level clustering where you have multiple instances of Weblogic Server program running simulatenously on same or different machines. So if you are running these instances on differnt machines, you are achieving application redundancy at host level and at the same time you get scalability and better application performance.
Refer the this link for Weblogic Clustering
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs70/cluster/overview.html#1003768
Thus if the application is spanned across multiple hosts and it provides redundancy among its instances, then MCSG is not required.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-22-2006 04:37 PM
тАО01-22-2006 04:37 PM
Re: Serviceguard Clustering versus WebLogic Clustering for Web Applications
I think, you can configure Weblogic Clustering in MCSG environment since it will provide greater failover, load balancing in a dedicated and distributed env.
FYI : http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/cluster/overview.html
-Arun
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-22-2006 11:29 PM
тАО01-22-2006 11:29 PM
Re: Serviceguard Clustering versus WebLogic Clustering for Web Applications
These are two different protections provided by application clustering and hardware clustring.
Application clustering will help you to protect against application crashes/shutdowns etc. whereas MC service guard alongwith these will also take care of some hardware failures in addition to these.
Suppose for instance, you had a local lan failed, then your application will not be able to do anything except stopping that instance and continuing to use the other one, whereas in MC service guard you will have local lan switch over to standby.
Another use will be in using one server for maintenance purposes with applications running on other.
HTH,
Devender