HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- STM and Cluster
Operating System - HP-UX
1827435
Members
4957
Online
109965
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-10-2006 02:38 AM
08-10-2006 02:38 AM
STM and Cluster
Hi, i have a problem with stm on two servers rp3410 with service guard installed. I always watch zombies proceses on both servers and the proceses are stm proceses.
Somebody know if there is a incompatibility problem with service guard and STM.
I upgrade the STM to the june version and the same process are present.
Please help.
Thanks.
Somebody know if there is a incompatibility problem with service guard and STM.
I upgrade the STM to the june version and the same process are present.
Please help.
Thanks.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-10-2006 02:45 AM
08-10-2006 02:45 AM
Re: STM and Cluster
David,
For what it is worth, I have only one rp3410 server running B.11.11.14.15 version of stm and I keep seeing a defunct process, with a ppid of a process which is a corehw monitor tool.
I am not sure what the root cause of this and never had a strong enough urge to investigate as it is not causing me any performance issues right now.
Once I contacted HP about it and their suggestion was to upgrade STM but it never got done.
You are not alone :)
For what it is worth, I have only one rp3410 server running B.11.11.14.15 version of stm and I keep seeing a defunct process, with a ppid of a process which is a corehw monitor tool.
I am not sure what the root cause of this and never had a strong enough urge to investigate as it is not causing me any performance issues right now.
Once I contacted HP about it and their suggestion was to upgrade STM but it never got done.
You are not alone :)
________________________________
UNIX because I majored in cryptology...
UNIX because I majored in cryptology...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-14-2006 04:07 AM
08-14-2006 04:07 AM
Re: STM and Cluster
Hi David,
This is normal behaviour for the ia64_corehw monitor, which I think, if you look at the 'ps -ef' output, you will find is the parent process of the process.
The monitor forks a child every minute. The child processes some of the log files, and then exits. The parent reaps the child by doing a 'wait' call every minute. Therefore, if the log processing is done quickly (which is normally the case), you will see a child of ia64_corehw most of the time. Note, however, that the process id of this is changing every minute.
I'd agree this may not be the most efficient way of doing things, but it should not cause any problems, and is not using any system resources beyond a process slot. There are currently no plans to change this behaviour.
Andrew
This is normal behaviour for the ia64_corehw monitor, which I think, if you look at the 'ps -ef' output, you will find is the parent process of the
The monitor forks a child every minute. The child processes some of the log files, and then exits. The parent reaps the child by doing a 'wait' call every minute. Therefore, if the log processing is done quickly (which is normally the case), you will see a
I'd agree this may not be the most efficient way of doing things, but it should not cause any problems, and is not using any system resources beyond a process slot. There are currently no plans to change this behaviour.
Andrew
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP