HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: the estimated hours to copy data from one fs t...
Operating System - HP-UX
1833046
Members
2605
Online
110049
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-17-2006 09:09 AM
04-17-2006 09:09 AM
the estimated hours to copy data from one fs to another?
I know it depends on the data type and the disk type, but what is your very rough estimated rate on how much data you can copy from one file system to another in an hour?
Some data are oracle datafile, and the target disks are emc disk. Thanks,
Some data are oracle datafile, and the target disks are emc disk. Thanks,
none
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-17-2006 09:22 AM
04-17-2006 09:22 AM
Re: the estimated hours to copy data from one fs to another?
There are so many unknowns here that this is ludicrous. All I can say is assume that no more than 1/2 of your total i/o bandwidth will be realized (and that is optimistic). Your only meaningful data will be to start a copy and interrupt it after 10 minutes or so and extrapolate. Even then, your values may be skewed because of the ratio of large to small files copied during the sample interval may not reflect the total fileset's ratio and the load of the system and array at the two times might be very different.
If it ain't broke, I can fix that.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-17-2006 09:32 AM
04-17-2006 09:32 AM
Re: the estimated hours to copy data from one fs to another?
Hi Hanry:
This is going to be dependent on many factors. If you are moving across a network, then that's a very rate-limiting step. If this is disk-to-disk, your throughput is potentially the best. Beyond that, there are at least two things that may have the biggest impact on your timings:
1. The number of files in the filesystems. Given a constant overall size, more files will take longer to copy than just a few large ones. This is because there is more metadata overhead (inode creation and update).
2. Mount options for the receiving filesystem, particularly, will affect performance. For the fastest build, you might want to *temporarily* use the following on the destination filesystem:
# mount -F vxfs -o nolog,convosync=delay
See the manpages for 'mount_vxfs.
I suggest that you time a small fraction of what you ultimately intend to transfer and simply extrapolate to the larger sample size as an estimate of the time for *your* configuration.
Regards!
...JRF...
This is going to be dependent on many factors. If you are moving across a network, then that's a very rate-limiting step. If this is disk-to-disk, your throughput is potentially the best. Beyond that, there are at least two things that may have the biggest impact on your timings:
1. The number of files in the filesystems. Given a constant overall size, more files will take longer to copy than just a few large ones. This is because there is more metadata overhead (inode creation and update).
2. Mount options for the receiving filesystem, particularly, will affect performance. For the fastest build, you might want to *temporarily* use the following on the destination filesystem:
# mount -F vxfs -o nolog,convosync=delay
See the manpages for 'mount_vxfs.
I suggest that you time a small fraction of what you ultimately intend to transfer and simply extrapolate to the larger sample size as an estimate of the time for *your* configuration.
Regards!
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-17-2006 10:19 AM
04-17-2006 10:19 AM
Re: the estimated hours to copy data from one fs to another?
Thanks for all your messsages.
I know there are a lot of elements, but just wanted to get an idea about the rate.
I know there are a lot of elements, but just wanted to get an idea about the rate.
none
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP