- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: /usr/lib/lib*.sl vs. /usr/lib/lib*.1 vs . /usr...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-26-2002 11:42 AM
03-26-2002 11:42 AM
/usr/lib/lib*.sl vs. /usr/lib/lib*.1 vs . /usr/lib/lib*.2
I have a problem with our development machine compared to our customers "production" machines, in our machine most of /usr/lib/lib*.sl (libc, libcl,libm,..) libraries/links points to .1 version of libs, and at the customer they point to .2 versions, and it seems to cause problems (when running apps in cust. host, we'll get "invalid version for shared library xxxx") mostly with oracles client library. I tried different library orders when linking and I also linked .2 versions to our progs. (and tried all sort of things) but I am not satisfied.
Question: why those *.sl links point to .1 versions in our system and to .2 versions at the customer, does some patch level affect that, both machines are UX11.0
What do I have to do to get those links to point to .2 versions (I think I just can't recreate them) ?
Thanks,
Hannu
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-26-2002 11:51 AM
03-26-2002 11:51 AM
Re: /usr/lib/lib*.sl vs. /usr/lib/lib*.1 vs . /usr/lib/lib*.2
do a man on "libcadmin"
live free or die
harry
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-26-2002 11:53 AM
03-26-2002 11:53 AM
Re: /usr/lib/lib*.sl vs. /usr/lib/lib*.1 vs . /usr/lib/lib*.2
do the two machines run different versions of Oracle? or was one installed twice or overwrote an old version? it almost seems like there is something like that going on. It sounds more like a software issue rather than a hp version or patch issue to me.
Mark
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-26-2002 11:57 AM
03-26-2002 11:57 AM
Re: /usr/lib/lib*.sl vs. /usr/lib/lib*.1 vs . /usr/lib/lib*.2
Are both machines IDENTICAL, meaning model, CPU speed, etc?
live free or die
harry
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-26-2002 12:01 PM
03-26-2002 12:01 PM
Re: /usr/lib/lib*.sl vs. /usr/lib/lib*.1 vs . /usr/lib/lib*.2
-Santosh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-27-2002 12:09 AM
03-27-2002 12:09 AM
Re: /usr/lib/lib*.sl vs. /usr/lib/lib*.1 vs . /usr/lib/lib*.2
At run time, the loader will attempt to load the embedded name. This allows app built on 10.20 linked to libc.1 to run on 11.x, as libc.1 is still provided.
"chatr" against a library will display its embedded name. "chatr" against an executable will list the libraries it will attempt to load.