Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-20-2003 07:43 AM
02-20-2003 07:43 AM
UUCP
CU works fine.
uucico -r1 -sSYS -x9 works ok up to the point when the protocol starts - please see attachment for more details.
Thanks in advance.
Gordon
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-20-2003 07:48 AM
02-20-2003 07:48 AM
Re: UUCP
In looking through your log, it appears that the connection is being established, and data is being tranferred. However, the connection for some reason is being dropped. This to me indicates a communication problem possibly at the line level. Are both modems "training" (negotiating) at the same speed, settings, etc.?
Just my two cents.
Regards.
RZ
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-20-2003 08:02 AM
02-20-2003 08:02 AM
Re: UUCP
As I said cu will work fine all day but uucp stops after the protocol has been established.
Interestingly ppp exhibits the same problem.
The two modems are
US Robotics sportster
Multitech ZX
Link speed is 19200
Error correction has been disabled but it didn't make any difference.
G
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-20-2003 08:07 AM
02-20-2003 08:07 AM
Re: UUCP
Both MultiTech & US Robotics have proprietary command sets.
BUT they both also support & have the Hayes command set as well. I'd set both these modems to the Hayes mode & suspect that may mitigate the problem. US Robotics, particularly has trouble negotiating with non-USR modems when in it's own command mode.
Rgds,
Jeff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-20-2003 08:20 AM
02-20-2003 08:20 AM
Re: UUCP
/usr/lib/uucp/Configuration
file on both machines.
From
http://osr5doc.ca.caldera.com:457/cgi-bin/man/man?Configuration+F
" The version of the `g' protocol implemented in SCO System V/386 Release 3.2 Version 4 (and earlier releases) used a fixed packet size of 64 bytes, and a fixed window size of 3, even though the specification for the `g' protocol allows different packet and window lengths to be selected. When communicating with such a `g' protocol host, the remote uucico may die if the correct packet and window sizes are not used in the modern uucico. (This limitation is common to many implementations of the UUCP `g' protocol under UNIX System V Release 3.2). "
Ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-21-2003 01:13 AM
02-21-2003 01:13 AM
Re: UUCP
The modems are both running in Hayes mode. And as stated cu works fine - I suspect it is something to do with packet sizes as per Ron's reply.
Ron,
Both systemes are running HP-UX 11i patched to the same level. HP-UX doesn't appear to support the Configuration file ( strings uucico reveals filenames being accessed and Configuartion isn't one of them)
So how do you force the PROTOCOL in HP-UX ?
G