- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- VxFS vs HFS
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-21-2006 06:35 AM
04-21-2006 06:35 AM
Is there much of a difference between VxFS and HFS - as far as looking at it from the outside goes - like the basic pv, lv, vg commands?
I also noticed that the root fs is hfs, and the other is VxFS.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-21-2006 06:39 AM
04-21-2006 06:39 AM
SolutionVxFS, since it is a journaled filesystem, will fsck much much much quicker in the event the system crashes. VxFS also allows you to do online expansion of LVs (if you have Advance JFS product), reduction of LVs and allows for MUCH larger files and file systems.
It really makes no sense to use HFS for anything besides /stand.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-21-2006 06:42 AM
04-21-2006 06:42 AM
Re: VxFS vs HFS
VxFS is otherwise known as a Journaled File System and is superior in performance to HFS.
VxFS and HFS are *filesystem* types. Filesystems sit inside logical volumes in LVM parlance. Hence, no, the 'pv*', 'lv*' and 'vg*' commands are common.
Up until 11.23, '/stand' must be an HFS filessystem type in order for the loader to find and boot the kernel.
Regards!
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-21-2006 06:42 AM
04-21-2006 06:42 AM
Re: VxFS vs HFS
The other commands that differ between hfs and vxfs are those related to ACL's; the commands are very similar in funnction but different in name.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-21-2006 06:44 AM
04-21-2006 06:44 AM
Re: VxFS vs HFS
That being said, use VxFS instead of HFS for your filesystems. VxFS has much greater flexiblity and is much better when it comes to recoverability.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-21-2006 06:45 AM
04-21-2006 06:45 AM
Re: VxFS vs HFS
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-21-2006 11:16 AM
04-21-2006 11:16 AM
Re: VxFS vs HFS
It was much better than PC filesystems which would allocate file space bottom up and best fit. This would leave holes and out of order clusters of data, thus slowing filesystem performance. But one of the downsides is that when the filesystem was not unmounted before a reboot (ie, powerfail or system crash), all the inodes and directory entries had to be checked, essentially a linear task. The more inodes, the longer fsck had to run. To fsck a 5Gb filesystem will require several minute.
So HFS was the standard until 10.00 was released and the Veritas Journaled Filesystem was made available for HP-UX. It had a very rocky start and for almost 2 years, it was to slow and unstable to be used in production. Then about the time 10.20 was released, the majority of showstopper bugs were fixed and VxFS was out-performing HFS. So VxFS is the filesystem of choice fcr HP-UX -- except for /stand.
/stand is special. The HP-UX boot loader requires that the first filesystem following the volume manager area on the boot disk must be HFS. This has been true for all versions of HP-UX until 11.23 where the HP-UX boot loader was drastically revised and now allows VxFS as a filesystem as well as VxVM as a volume manager.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-22-2006 12:19 PM
04-22-2006 12:19 PM
Re: VxFS vs HFS
http://www1.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docLocale=en_US&docId=200000080092269
P.S. note that VxFS==JFS
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-24-2006 04:45 AM
04-24-2006 04:45 AM