- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- DLT7000 on redhat linux 7.2
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2003 02:11 AM
11-13-2003 02:11 AM
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2003 02:37 AM
11-13-2003 02:37 AM
Re: DLT7000 on redhat linux 7.2
Can you post your data on the detect? That would help.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2003 02:50 AM
11-13-2003 02:50 AM
Re: DLT7000 on redhat linux 7.2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2003 03:00 AM
11-13-2003 03:00 AM
SolutionIf the device is LVD(Low Voltage Differential) and the internal port is different you can damage the device this way.
I don't think its Linux. You need to check the doc on the DLT and then the server and make sure the internal port is exactly right. If not, you'll be needing to purchase the correct SCSI card.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2003 03:53 AM
11-13-2003 03:53 AM
Re: DLT7000 on redhat linux 7.2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2003 04:21 AM
11-13-2003 04:21 AM
Re: DLT7000 on redhat linux 7.2
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2003 12:56 PM
11-13-2003 12:56 PM
Re: DLT7000 on redhat linux 7.2
1 x IDE onboard
2 x Adaptec SCSI 3 controllers
Most people then add a RAID controller of some description (usually a HP-NETRAID (which is based on the AMI MegaRAID series)).
You will also need to ensure that the correct kernel modules are loaded (use 'lsmod').
The NetRAID uses 'megaraid'. This controller cannot have a tape attached to it.
The onboard Adaptec controllers use the 'aic7xxx' driver.
If you look in /proc/scsi/scsi, you should see the NetRAID listed, your HDD/Array, and (if the 'st' module is loaded) the tape drive as a 'Sequential-Access' device.
Show us what you can see please, the output of 'lsmod', and of 'cat /proc/scsi/scsi'.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-14-2003 06:56 AM
11-14-2003 06:56 AM
Re: DLT7000 on redhat linux 7.2
Thanks for ur help
[root@salato-apl10 samba]# cat lsmod.txt
Module Size Used by Not tainted
sg 35076 0 (autoclean)
nfsd 80704 8 (autoclean)
lockd 61184 1 (autoclean) [nfsd]
sunrpc 86032 1 (autoclean) [nfsd lockd]
ide-cd 35296 0 (autoclean)
cdrom 35520 0 (autoclean) [ide-cd]
soundcore 7940 0 (autoclean)
autofs 13796 0 (autoclean) (unused)
eepro100 21968 1
ipchains 47880 1
st 30548 0
ext3 73536 6
jbd 55048 6 [ext3]
aic7xxx 127200 0
megaraid 28160 10
sd_mod 13468 10
scsi_mod 125084 5 [sg st aic7xxx megaraid sd_mod]
[root@salato-apl10 samba]# more scsi.txt
Attached devices:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 05 Lun: 00
Vendor: HP Model: SAFTE; U160/M BP Rev: 1023
Type: Processor ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 02 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: MegaRAID Model: LD0 RAID5 86825R Rev: E
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi1 Channel: 00 Id: 05 Lun: 00
Vendor: HP Model: SAFTE; U160/M BP Rev: 1023
Type: Processor ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi1 Channel: 01 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: MegaRAID Model: LD0 RAID5 73655R Rev: F
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 00
Vendor: QUANTUM Model: DLT7000 Rev: 2565
Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-16-2003 10:29 AM
11-16-2003 10:29 AM
Re: DLT7000 on redhat linux 7.2
It all appears as if it has been detected correctly.
Tape is plugged into the on-board Adaptec's second channel, at ID 1.
Using the 'dmesg' comand (or /var/log/dmesg) you should be able to find reference to the device 'st0'. This is your tape drive.
Judging by the details you've sent, it will always be 'st0'.
Could you try to get a snapshot of the system (same details) when it is being detected as a fixed-disk (rather than a sequential-access) device.
The fact that 'cdrecord -scanbus' doesn't identify it correctly isn't much to be concerned about in my opinion.
'mt -f /dev/st0 status' is a better indicator.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-17-2003 01:38 AM
11-17-2003 01:38 AM