- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: Incorrect memory size reporting in RHL ES 2.1
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-27-2005 07:56 PM
04-27-2005 07:56 PM
Incorrect memory size reporting in RHL ES 2.1
We have installed RHL ES 2.1 (Panama) 2.4.9-e.57 on 2 servers both servers are reporting incorrect RAM size. 4GB of RAM available, it is correctly reported while POST and in BIOS, but Linux reports it as 3072260K.
Is this is a bug with 2.4.9-e.57 version of kernel?
Is there any patch avaliable to fix this??
Thanks in advance..
Krishna
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-27-2005 09:51 PM
04-27-2005 09:51 PM
Re: Incorrect memory size reporting in RHL ES 2.1
Have you installed the bigmem rpm?
Take a look at this: http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/redhat/9/i386/kernel-bigmem-2.4.20-8.i686.html
Maybe that helps.
Cheers,
Renarios
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-27-2005 11:57 PM
04-27-2005 11:57 PM
Re: Incorrect memory size reporting in RHL ES 2.1
Thanks for your info.. But in that site kernel-bigmem rpm for RHL ES 2.1 is not found, can we find RPM/source for RHL ES 2.1?
Thanks and Regards,
Krishna.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-28-2005 02:49 AM
04-28-2005 02:49 AM
Re: Incorrect memory size reporting in RHL ES 2.1
On Fedora you can use yum to update the servers, but i don't know if RH AS also uses it. The installation CD should contain it too.
Did you search the download site of Redhat too?
Cheers,
Renarios
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-28-2005 01:35 PM
04-28-2005 01:35 PM
Re: Incorrect memory size reporting in RHL ES 2.1
Have you tried 'up2date install kernel-bigmem' ?
Failing that, go to the RedHat Network page, log in, and download the RPM's that way.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-28-2005 05:59 PM
04-28-2005 05:59 PM
Re: Incorrect memory size reporting in RHL ES 2.1
This RPM fix is not available in Installation media or even it is not found in RHN.
But i found kernel-hugemem-2.4.21-27.0.4.EL.i686 for RHL ES 3.0 on installation media and in RHN.This Kernel is applied, for machines with more than 16 Gigabytes of memory.
Can we find hugemem/bigmem kernel source??
Krishna.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-28-2005 06:45 PM
04-28-2005 06:45 PM
Re: Incorrect memory size reporting in RHL ES 2.1
You may be able to download kernel-source package, compile it enabling high memory option and get it to recognise 4G of RAM that way.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-28-2005 07:15 PM
04-28-2005 07:15 PM
Re: Incorrect memory size reporting in RHL ES 2.1
Which servers are you using? ( I forgot the exact models, but some servers show less memory on OS if exactly 4 GB RAM is installed, typically it's a behaviour of some Intel based mainboards, and this can be corrected out by changing some settings in BIOS setup).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-28-2005 07:29 PM
04-28-2005 07:29 PM
Re: Incorrect memory size reporting in RHL ES 2.1
Server is Dell PE 2850, but BIOS reports RAM size correctly.
Krishna
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-28-2005 08:14 PM
04-28-2005 08:14 PM
Re: Incorrect memory size reporting in RHL ES 2.1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-29-2005 04:05 AM
04-29-2005 04:05 AM