Operating System - Linux
1836186 Members
2407 Online
110096 Solutions
New Discussion

Memory problem on RHAS2.1

 
Ryan Lee
Advisor

Memory problem on RHAS2.1

I have got a server with 16GB memory and 8xCPU runing on RHAS2.1. the kernel is 2.4.9-e.25 enterprise version. when I running tar or rsync to backup most files. the server should be hang. I reported to redhat, they teach me to tuning pagacache and freepages to (2 7 14 / 1276 2552 3828). but still hang again.

I try to change fs to ext2, but still can not solve the problem.
is it the kernel can not support more memory?

Error code is
ENOMEM in do_get_write_access, retrying.
ENOMEM in journal_get_undo_access_Rsmp_767cdac6, retrying.
ENOMEM in do_get_write_access, retrying.
ENOMEM in journal_get_undo_access_Rsmp_767cdac6, retrying.
ENOMEM in journal_get_undo_access_Rsmp_767cdac6, retrying.
7 REPLIES 7
Steven E. Protter
Exalted Contributor

Re: Memory problem on RHAS2.1

Could you take a look at this thread and post up some memory information. It would be most helpful.

http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=252269


I think you are using the right kernel so you are okay there.

What are the available kernels on your sytsem? Are you using the one designed for big memory(over 2 GB) That's a must in this case. As I said, I think you are, but I'm not all that familiar with how RH named the kernels in that distribution.

SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Stuart Browne
Honored Contributor

Re: Memory problem on RHAS2.1

Apart from the fact that the latest kernel revision for RHAS2.1 is 2.4.9-e.27 (I beleive), there are bugzilla reports of this exact error with large amounts of memory.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99025

You may want to pipe in and give 'em a hand in finding more details.

This thread has been in these forums once before as well, a few months ago.
One long-haired git at your service...
Ragu_1
Regular Advisor

Re: Memory problem on RHAS2.1

If I were you, I would patch the kernel Linux to 2.4.22 and refer to the kernel enhancements made by RH. After doing this I would re-compile the kernel, with CONFIG_NOHIMEM=64GB because you have 16 GB physical RAM. Reboot under ext3 and test for write commit errors. Anyway, recompile the stock RHAS kernel with `High Memory Support' set to 64 GB. GNUspeed......
Share and share alike
Stuart Browne
Honored Contributor

Re: Memory problem on RHAS2.1

.. Oh .. It was your thread last time.

Did you end up getting into Bugzilla and talking to the RedHat guys about this issue?
One long-haired git at your service...
Steven E. Protter
Exalted Contributor

Re: Memory problem on RHAS2.1

Stuart,

Got a hot one for you misposted to HP-UX.

I think you can solve this one.

http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=253288

SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Stuart Browne
Honored Contributor

Re: Memory problem on RHAS2.1

Actually I've never done SMTP auth through 'sendmail', but the links you provided seem to cover most of the topics needed. I've posted 2 more, one for RH, one for SuSE..

It looks as if he was getting confused though, going off on the suse-postfix tangent. Ah the fun of thread hijacking :P
One long-haired git at your service...
Ryan Lee
Advisor

Re: Memory problem on RHAS2.1

Thank you for your reply. Redhat tell me the kernel 2.4.9-e.27 is updated security patch. So I have not update the kernel, they just tuning down the cache size. is it limitation in kernel 2.4.9.

I try to setting the memory to 8gb,no problem.

I asks for the user that post to bugzilla.
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99025) he just tuning down the physical memory to 16gb.

Our server is DL740, I reported the rehdat again, But still have not reply to me.