HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: oprofile
Operating System - Linux
1825766
Members
2098
Online
109687
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-24-2008 11:08 AM
04-24-2008 11:08 AM
I ran oprofile on RHEL4U6 and got the following report. What does cache refer to? Is it referring to Linux memory cache or the processor L2 cache? Why is my system spending so much time in cache? Thanks.
CPU: P4 / Xeon with 2 hyper-threads, speed 3000.38 MHz (estimated)
Counted GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS events (time during which processor is not stopped) with a unit mask of 0x01 (mandatory) count 100000
GLOBAL_POWER_E...|
samples| %|
------------------
14219190 78.5593 cache
2596696 14.3464 vmlinux
985675 5.4457 libc-2.3.4.so
116542 0.6439 oprofiled
105647 0.5837 tg3
67943 0.3754 oprofile
1601 0.0088 top
1253 0.0069 ext3
1064 0.0059 jbd
769 0.0042 libproc-3.2.3.so
713 0.0039 hald
613 0.0034 libncurses.so.5.4
443 0.0024 bash
428 0.0024 uhci_hcd
249 0.0014 ld-2.3.4.so
216 0.0012 ehci_hcd
121 6.7e-04 libcrypto.so.0.9.7a
113 6.2e-04 cciss
90 5.0e-04 libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.7
85 4.7e-04 qla2xxx
CPU: P4 / Xeon with 2 hyper-threads, speed 3000.38 MHz (estimated)
Counted GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS events (time during which processor is not stopped) with a unit mask of 0x01 (mandatory) count 100000
GLOBAL_POWER_E...|
samples| %|
------------------
14219190 78.5593 cache
2596696 14.3464 vmlinux
985675 5.4457 libc-2.3.4.so
116542 0.6439 oprofiled
105647 0.5837 tg3
67943 0.3754 oprofile
1601 0.0088 top
1253 0.0069 ext3
1064 0.0059 jbd
769 0.0042 libproc-3.2.3.so
713 0.0039 hald
613 0.0034 libncurses.so.5.4
443 0.0024 bash
428 0.0024 uhci_hcd
249 0.0014 ld-2.3.4.so
216 0.0012 ehci_hcd
121 6.7e-04 libcrypto.so.0.9.7a
113 6.2e-04 cciss
90 5.0e-04 libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.7
85 4.7e-04 qla2xxx
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-25-2008 02:15 AM
04-25-2008 02:15 AM
Solution
Just a guess , but you are using fibre channel drives (qla2xxx) driver. Correct?
I have seen huge cache hits. If the i/o to the FC drives is to high for the number of spindles attached to the LUN.
Run iostat to see the usage.
Are you using path management software (securepath , powerpath etc)
Looks to me that a LUN is max'd out.
I have seen huge cache hits. If the i/o to the FC drives is to high for the number of spindles attached to the LUN.
Run iostat to see the usage.
Are you using path management software (securepath , powerpath etc)
Looks to me that a LUN is max'd out.
Divide and Conquer
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-25-2008 07:26 AM
04-25-2008 07:26 AM
Re: oprofile
No, we're not using SAN disks. We're using internal RAIDed disks in a DL580. But thanks for the hint. I'll check iostat.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-25-2008 07:47 AM
04-25-2008 07:47 AM
Re: oprofile
No it wasn't disks being saturated. Turns out the application being run is called "cache". That's what it was!
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP