HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: poor MSA performance
Operating System - Linux
1830190
Members
2739
Online
109999
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-05-2007 05:50 AM
11-05-2007 05:50 AM
poor MSA performance
Hi all,
I was at a clients site today where there is an MSA 1500CS and an HPdl380g5 running CentOS4. The client was complaining of poor performance and after doing a couple of tests we got the below results.
An hdparm ran against the msa looks like this:
[root@yaeyo var]# hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 116 MB in 3.07 seconds = 37.84 MB/sec
I have also noticed that a local drive that used to be somewhere over 90 mb
/sec (a 15k rpm scsi drive), after inserting the HBA in the server has
slowed down to this:
[root@yaeyo var]# hdparm -t /dev/cciss/c0d0
/dev/cciss/c0d0:
Timing buffered disk reads: 78 MB in 3.04 seconds = 25.68 MB/sec
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl
for device
Of course we are talking about running the hdparm test agains _idle_ drives.
Other thing I have noticed is that withouth the HBA, hpacucli returns almost
immediate output from command "ctrl all show config" while after inserting
the HBA it takes about 6-7 seconds of screen freeze before it dumps the
requested command output.
Questions:
1) What is the expected hdparm -t result ran against the MSA1500CS array in
the idle mode and in the default configuration created by the cpqacuxe web
gui (A RAID 6 array of 6 SCSI ULTRA320 disks) ?
2) What do the following dmesg messages mean?
lpfc 0000:0a:01.0: 0:0326 Rsp Ring 0 error: IOCB Data: xff000020 x22580c0 x0
x0 xe3 x0 x3d60ce1 xa29b16
lpfc 0000:0a:01.0: 0:0729 FCP cmd xa3 failed <0/1> status: x1 result: xe3
Data: x3d6 xce1
lpfc 0000:0a:01.0: 0:0730 FCP command failed: RSP Data: x9 x0 xe3 x0 x8 x0
lpfc 0000:0a:01.0: 0:0716 FCP Read Underrun, expected 255, residual 227
Data: xff xa3 x0
lpfc 0000:0a:01.0: 0:0326 Rsp Ring 0 error: IOCB Data: xff000020 x22580c0 x0
x0 xab x0 x3d40ce2 xa29b16
lpfc 0000:0a:01.1: 1:0326 Rsp Ring 0 error: IOCB Data: xff000020 x23301c8 x0
x0 xe3 x0 x1e8083a xa29b16
lpfc 0000:0a:01.1: 1:0729 FCP cmd xa3 failed <0/3> status: x1 result: xe3
Data: x1e8 x83a
lpfc 0000:0a:01.1: 1:0730 FCP command failed: RSP Data: x9 x0 xe3 x0 x8 x0
lpfc 0000:0a:01.1: 1:0716 FCP Read Underrun, expected 255, residual 227
Data: xff xa3 x0
Thank your for your help!
Marius
I was at a clients site today where there is an MSA 1500CS and an HPdl380g5 running CentOS4. The client was complaining of poor performance and after doing a couple of tests we got the below results.
An hdparm ran against the msa looks like this:
[root@yaeyo var]# hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 116 MB in 3.07 seconds = 37.84 MB/sec
I have also noticed that a local drive that used to be somewhere over 90 mb
/sec (a 15k rpm scsi drive), after inserting the HBA in the server has
slowed down to this:
[root@yaeyo var]# hdparm -t /dev/cciss/c0d0
/dev/cciss/c0d0:
Timing buffered disk reads: 78 MB in 3.04 seconds = 25.68 MB/sec
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl
for device
Of course we are talking about running the hdparm test agains _idle_ drives.
Other thing I have noticed is that withouth the HBA, hpacucli returns almost
immediate output from command "ctrl all show config" while after inserting
the HBA it takes about 6-7 seconds of screen freeze before it dumps the
requested command output.
Questions:
1) What is the expected hdparm -t result ran against the MSA1500CS array in
the idle mode and in the default configuration created by the cpqacuxe web
gui (A RAID 6 array of 6 SCSI ULTRA320 disks) ?
2) What do the following dmesg messages mean?
lpfc 0000:0a:01.0: 0:0326 Rsp Ring 0 error: IOCB Data: xff000020 x22580c0 x0
x0 xe3 x0 x3d60ce1 xa29b16
lpfc 0000:0a:01.0: 0:0729 FCP cmd xa3 failed <0/1> status: x1 result: xe3
Data: x3d6 xce1
lpfc 0000:0a:01.0: 0:0730 FCP command failed: RSP Data: x9 x0 xe3 x0 x8 x0
lpfc 0000:0a:01.0: 0:0716 FCP Read Underrun, expected 255, residual 227
Data: xff xa3 x0
lpfc 0000:0a:01.0: 0:0326 Rsp Ring 0 error: IOCB Data: xff000020 x22580c0 x0
x0 xab x0 x3d40ce2 xa29b16
lpfc 0000:0a:01.1: 1:0326 Rsp Ring 0 error: IOCB Data: xff000020 x23301c8 x0
x0 xe3 x0 x1e8083a xa29b16
lpfc 0000:0a:01.1: 1:0729 FCP cmd xa3 failed <0/3> status: x1 result: xe3
Data: x1e8 x83a
lpfc 0000:0a:01.1: 1:0730 FCP command failed: RSP Data: x9 x0 xe3 x0 x8 x0
lpfc 0000:0a:01.1: 1:0716 FCP Read Underrun, expected 255, residual 227
Data: xff xa3 x0
Thank your for your help!
Marius
"The Linux philosophy is 'Laugh in the face of danger'. Oops. Wrong One. 'Do it yourself'. Yes, that's it." --Linus Torvalds
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-06-2007 05:43 PM
12-06-2007 05:43 PM
Re: poor MSA performance
Hi Marius
Im adding to the observations from a REdhat AS 4 box --- not at latest patch levels.
box 1
--------
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 18 MB in 3.02 seconds = 5.96 MB/sec
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 198 MB in 3.00 seconds = 65.97 MB/sec
box 2 (same MSA1500 different logical drives)
------
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 2 MB in 3.19 seconds = 642.51 kB/sec
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 152 MB in 4.41 seconds = 34.47 MB/sec
box 3 (same MSA1500 -- different logical drives)
---------
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 176 MB in 3.01 seconds = 58.42 MB/sec
Servers are Proliants -- typical CCIS respons e is
/dev/cciss/c0d0:
Timing buffered disk reads: 256 MB in 3.08 seconds = 83.05 MB/sec
So my response is jumping around , but can be very slow from the attached array.
re the lpfc errors, they are boot up messages only or do you see them in syslog on a booted system as well ?
The systems that I have with the MSA1500 are poor performing -- have great processors, lots of RAM but things run very slowly.
Im adding to the observations from a REdhat AS 4 box --- not at latest patch levels.
box 1
--------
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 18 MB in 3.02 seconds = 5.96 MB/sec
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 198 MB in 3.00 seconds = 65.97 MB/sec
box 2 (same MSA1500 different logical drives)
------
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 2 MB in 3.19 seconds = 642.51 kB/sec
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 152 MB in 4.41 seconds = 34.47 MB/sec
box 3 (same MSA1500 -- different logical drives)
---------
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 176 MB in 3.01 seconds = 58.42 MB/sec
Servers are Proliants -- typical CCIS respons e is
/dev/cciss/c0d0:
Timing buffered disk reads: 256 MB in 3.08 seconds = 83.05 MB/sec
So my response is jumping around , but can be very slow from the attached array.
re the lpfc errors, they are boot up messages only or do you see them in syslog on a booted system as well ?
The systems that I have with the MSA1500 are poor performing -- have great processors, lots of RAM but things run very slowly.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP