HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Connections in rejected on HSG80
Operating System - OpenVMS
1829466
Members
1918
Online
109991
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-27-2006 03:14 AM
03-27-2006 03:14 AM
We have recently hit the maximum connection limit on our HSG80's. The limit is 96.
Each OpenVMS server has 4 connections into the HSG80 pair. We have 4 pair of HSG's.
In order to facilitate some extra servers (2) we would require an extra 8 connections. Thats 4 per new new server.
The best solution was to reduce the number of connections that could be seen from some of development servers.
We were going to go from 4 per server.
2 Top - Port 1 + Port 2
2 Bottom - Port 1 + Port 2
to 2 per server
1 Top - Port 1
1 Bottom Port 2.
Plan was to shutdown the four development servers and power off.
Delete connections we did not want.
Power up new servers.
4 !newcon per server. Rename them.
Power up development server.
Now each development server has 2 connection in main table and 2 in rejected table.
(All disk path were changed to reflect less path to disk - in fact you cant delete connections until they are no longer referenced).
The 2 OpenVMS 7.3 development servers boot just fine. With conn in main table and rejected.
The 2 OpenVMS 7.2-1H1 development servers hang during boot for approx 87 minutes because they have connections in the rejected table.
Reverse the process and they boot o.k.
So it looks like something was fixed in 7.3 to enable servers to boot with connections in rejected table.
Has anyone seen this prior ? or have knowledge of what was fixed ?
I have a call open with HP.
After backout of change.
We have new servers with all 8 connections in the rejected table.
Development servers with 4 connections each in main table, 2 as !newconns with no reference to them via disk path and the two original connections with reference on disk path. However development servers now boot o.k.
Well one does not correctly ...but thats another long story.
Kevin Raven
Each OpenVMS server has 4 connections into the HSG80 pair. We have 4 pair of HSG's.
In order to facilitate some extra servers (2) we would require an extra 8 connections. Thats 4 per new new server.
The best solution was to reduce the number of connections that could be seen from some of development servers.
We were going to go from 4 per server.
2 Top - Port 1 + Port 2
2 Bottom - Port 1 + Port 2
to 2 per server
1 Top - Port 1
1 Bottom Port 2.
Plan was to shutdown the four development servers and power off.
Delete connections we did not want.
Power up new servers.
4 !newcon per server. Rename them.
Power up development server.
Now each development server has 2 connection in main table and 2 in rejected table.
(All disk path were changed to reflect less path to disk - in fact you cant delete connections until they are no longer referenced).
The 2 OpenVMS 7.3 development servers boot just fine. With conn in main table and rejected.
The 2 OpenVMS 7.2-1H1 development servers hang during boot for approx 87 minutes because they have connections in the rejected table.
Reverse the process and they boot o.k.
So it looks like something was fixed in 7.3 to enable servers to boot with connections in rejected table.
Has anyone seen this prior ? or have knowledge of what was fixed ?
I have a call open with HP.
After backout of change.
We have new servers with all 8 connections in the rejected table.
Development servers with 4 connections each in main table, 2 as !newconns with no reference to them via disk path and the two original connections with reference on disk path. However development servers now boot o.k.
Well one does not correctly ...but thats another long story.
Kevin Raven
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-27-2006 04:08 AM
03-27-2006 04:08 AM
Solution
The 2 OpenVMS 7.3 development servers boot just fine. With conn in main table and rejected.
The 2 OpenVMS 7.2-1H1 development servers hang during boot for approx 87 minutes because they have connections in the rejected table.
Reverse the process and they boot o.k.
---
Why are you using V7.2-1H1? That release was hardware-specific for the GS80/GS160/GS320.
You really should upgrade to V7.3-2 in order to run on a supported configuration
Failing that, V7.3-1 is a *much* better release for multipath -- we cleaned up a lot of stuff for V7.3-1 within multipath -- that work was not backported to V7.3, because it came in the context of doing the work to support the MSCP path with multipath on V7.3-1, and the effort to backport would have been rather large.
-- Rob
The 2 OpenVMS 7.2-1H1 development servers hang during boot for approx 87 minutes because they have connections in the rejected table.
Reverse the process and they boot o.k.
---
Why are you using V7.2-1H1? That release was hardware-specific for the GS80/GS160/GS320.
You really should upgrade to V7.3-2 in order to run on a supported configuration
Failing that, V7.3-1 is a *much* better release for multipath -- we cleaned up a lot of stuff for V7.3-1 within multipath -- that work was not backported to V7.3, because it came in the context of doing the work to support the MSCP path with multipath on V7.3-1, and the effort to backport would have been rather large.
-- Rob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-27-2006 04:10 AM
03-27-2006 04:10 AM
Re: Connections in rejected on HSG80
So the 'unwanted paths' still do exist, otherwise you would not have rejected connections.
That should be fixed by implementing zoning in the Fibre Channel switches which ensures that only the paths you want are possible.
That should be fixed by implementing zoning in the Fibre Channel switches which ensures that only the paths you want are possible.
.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-27-2006 07:38 PM
03-27-2006 07:38 PM
Re: Connections in rejected on HSG80
We are running OpenVMS 7.2-1H1 on Alpha Server ES40 model 2.
This is what was recommended to us by Compaq back in 2001.
We are currently engaged in a project to upgrade to 7.3-2.
This is what the new boxes joining the SAN will be used for (parallel running under 7.3-2).
Bit of a rock and a hard place.
Seems to work ok under 7.3 however.
This is what was recommended to us by Compaq back in 2001.
We are currently engaged in a project to upgrade to 7.3-2.
This is what the new boxes joining the SAN will be used for (parallel running under 7.3-2).
Bit of a rock and a hard place.
Seems to work ok under 7.3 however.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP