- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: F$SEARCH failed
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-28-2004 05:02 AM
05-28-2004 05:02 AM
Re: F$SEARCH failed
don't change protections on directories on active production systems.
To avoid change file protection you could use SET PROT statement as follow:
$! Set protection
$ SET PROT=(S:RWED,...)/DEF
$! here open new file
In this manner every new file assume the protection profile you have defined and you don't need change it (if it's applicable)
Antonio Vigliotti
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-28-2004 06:22 AM
05-28-2004 06:22 AM
Re: F$SEARCH failed
Jan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-28-2004 07:15 AM
05-28-2004 07:15 AM
Re: F$SEARCH failed
Both can be altered with an ACL, though.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-28-2004 09:45 AM
05-28-2004 09:45 AM
Re: F$SEARCH failed
... then, (and I know you read this), please, Guy Peleg, can we put this on your list?
Obviously he is not able to take part and read all of these many VMS entries in ITRC. But I'm sure several of you guys are quite familiar with him. So put him an email, I personally would also highly appreciate if f$search would send an error message in case of the directory file is locked instead of a "successfully" null string.
Cheers
Eberhard
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-28-2004 03:19 PM
05-28-2004 03:19 PM
Re: F$SEARCH failed
I've sent a mail to Guy with a link to this thread. Obviously this is an unconventional way to report such an issue and at best we can hope on a response on a "as time permits" basis. ITRC forums are not part of the job description for hp employees, so if they are not able to participate or react because of their regular work schedule this is maybe bad luck for us, but nothing you can complain about ;-)
Greetings, Martin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-28-2004 09:43 PM
05-28-2004 09:43 PM
Re: F$SEARCH failed
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-31-2004 03:30 AM
05-31-2004 03:30 AM
Re: F$SEARCH failed
I've attached a simple DCL command procedure to write new files with a specific protection mask.
As you can see, protection mask is restored to original value.
Regards.
Antonio Vigliotti
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-31-2004 05:01 AM
05-31-2004 05:01 AM
Re: F$SEARCH failed
I thought the problem had to do with correcting a directory's protection.
You can create a file with a specific protection quite easy:
$ copy nl: a.tmp /protection=(s:re,g:e,w:rwe)
And for directories it es easy, too, but I bet you know that:
$ create/directory/protection=(s:re,g:rwe,w:e) [.a]
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-31-2004 05:52 AM
05-31-2004 05:52 AM
Re: F$SEARCH failed
>ty wim1.lis
$a:
$ set file wim.dir/prot=w:rwed/own=system
$ set file [.wim]*.* /prot=w:rwed/own=system
$ goto a
>ty wim2.lis
$ set ver
$ on warning then exit
$ file_searc="*.*"
$ a:
$ f1=f$sea(file_searc,1)
$ f2=f$sea(file_searc,2)
$ if f1.eqs."" .and. f2.eqs."" then exit
$ goto a
Apparently is dummy but might be very hardly receive twice locked condition. Solution waiting HP patch.
Antonio Vigliotti
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »