- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: LANCP unavailable user buffers
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-14-2008 09:25 AM
02-14-2008 09:25 AM
LANCP unavailable user buffers
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-14-2008 10:07 AM
02-14-2008 10:07 AM
Re: LANCP unavailable user buffers
For Decnet Phase IV, can you post
$ mc ncp sh k line counters
$ mc ncp sh 'remote' counters
$ mc ncp sh exe counters
(remote being your remote node)
and the same on the remote node (replacing remote by your first node)
May be there is some routing involved, do the Decnet addresses are in the same area (for example, 20.60 and 20.61) ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-14-2008 10:29 AM
02-14-2008 10:29 AM
Re: LANCP unavailable user buffers
welcome to the OpenVMS ITRC forum.
With ANA/SYS and SDA> SHOW LAN/COUNTERS you may be able to see, which protocol is incuring the Unavaliable User Buffer events and when the last UUB event has happened. Does this information correlate with your DECnet copies ?
Please note that whenever DECnet packets get lost, the retransmission time is typically significant and is often interpreted as 'bad performance'.
Volker.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-15-2008 01:30 AM
02-15-2008 01:30 AM
Re: LANCP unavailable user buffers
Short answer: I don't believe you can add more buffers to DECnet IV (not sure about V). As Volker points out, either version of DECnet will recover the lost buffers and if there are not LOTS (an undefined largeish number) of then, this should not cause a problem. Unavailable User Buffers are just that: It is the user defined space where the driver (probably Ethernet in this case) copies received data to. The number of buffers is defined to the driver when the protocol starts and when you have control of the code, or create an appropriate interface, you can control this number at startup. It has been some years sine I looked at this and certainly then (c. 7 years) , there was no solution. Nor was there a practical problem - more an irritating anomoly.
Regards
Paul
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-15-2008 06:04 AM
02-15-2008 06:04 AM
Re: LANCP unavailable user buffers
For DECnet-IV, the NCP SET LINE dev RECEIVE n will affect this number, and in your case, should reduce the number of packets lost. You might have to adjust the pipeline values as well to stop each side from sending more data than the other side can receive without loss.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-16-2008 04:42 PM
02-16-2008 04:42 PM