HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: Odd order of entries in ITRC patch browse list
Operating System - OpenVMS
1828453
Members
3927
Online
109978
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-12-2006 09:57 PM
12-12-2006 09:57 PM
Odd order of entries in ITRC patch browse list
The ITRC has an option to browse all the patches for a VMS platform and version.
The order in which the results are presented seems to be by descending date within ascending install rating. This is sensible, as the most recent most important patches come first.
However, for some reason the MASTER ECO list always appears part-way through the install_1 section. e.g at present it is between the dates 2005/10/27 and 2005/09/29.
Does anyone know the reason for this?
I would prefer it to appear in the "correct" place...
Can it (should it) be corrected?
The order in which the results are presented seems to be by descending date within ascending install rating. This is sensible, as the most recent most important patches come first.
However, for some reason the MASTER ECO list always appears part-way through the install_1 section. e.g at present it is between the dates 2005/10/27 and 2005/09/29.
Does anyone know the reason for this?
I would prefer it to appear in the "correct" place...
Can it (should it) be corrected?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-12-2006 10:23 PM
12-12-2006 10:23 PM
Re: Odd order of entries in ITRC patch browse list
There have been other discussions on this subject.
http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1020395
http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1013228
The document is manually updated and someone forgot to change the sort date (as the master eco changes from time to time).
HP ?
Wim
http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1020395
http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1013228
The document is manually updated and someone forgot to change the sort date (as the master eco changes from time to time).
HP ?
Wim
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-12-2006 10:35 PM
12-12-2006 10:35 PM
Re: Odd order of entries in ITRC patch browse list
I take it you mean that there is a hidden sort date attribute that is used by the sort?
BTW, the links you include were about errors in the ECO list contents, not its placement in the results - which I think is a separate issue..
BTW, the links you include were about errors in the ECO list contents, not its placement in the results - which I think is a separate issue..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-12-2006 11:46 PM
12-12-2006 11:46 PM
Re: Odd order of entries in ITRC patch browse list
Mmm, the first link shouldn't have been posted.
"Updating the ALPHA_V732_MASTER_ECO_LIST is currently a manual operation and sometimes errors creep in".
I guess they updated an old file and forgot to update the "sortdate". It must be something like that because if the "postdate" was used, it should have been on the correct sequence.
Wim
"Updating the ALPHA_V732_MASTER_ECO_LIST is currently a manual operation and sometimes errors creep in".
I guess they updated an old file and forgot to update the "sortdate". It must be something like that because if the "postdate" was used, it should have been on the correct sequence.
Wim
Wim
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP