- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Primary vs Current Disk Paths
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-09-2006 09:11 AM
тАО03-09-2006 09:11 AM
What's the definition of PRIMARY and why would this info be useful to me? Doesn't CURRENT mean that all I/O (data + cmds) go across that path? Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-09-2006 09:26 AM
тАО03-09-2006 09:26 AM
Re: Primary vs Current Disk Paths
If the device has multiple I/O paths, then primary path is the first one found by OpenVMS at I/O configuration.
And the current path is the one in use now.
A path can be set manually via
$ SET DEVICE/PATH=device-path/SWITCH
A path can be changed automatically by a mount verification.
Starting with OpenVMS V7.2-2 (or earlier with VMS721_SYSV0100 or VMS721H1_SYS-V0600) mount verification attempts the current path first.
Before OpenVMS 7.2-2 mount verification attempts the primary path first
Starting with OpenVMS V7.3-1, mounting a multipath disk can result in a path change.
Archunan
Archie
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-09-2006 09:51 AM
тАО03-09-2006 09:51 AM
Re: Primary vs Current Disk Paths
The idea of which IO patch to the SAN is the current path or Primary path is useful when trying to look at balancing IO across multiple Physical IO connections to the SAN. If you have a large number opf drives connected to the SAN with multiple IO paths you can use the SET DEVICE/PATH=io-path-name/SWITCH to balance the IO across the multiple physical connections. If you do not do the SET DEVICE/PATH= command then all of your SAN drives will end up using the same IO path to the SAN and you create a possible IO bottleneck situation.
As for the Primary path it is simply the first connection that the H/W finds when connecting to the SAN.
Phil
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-09-2006 11:52 AM
тАО03-09-2006 11:52 AM
Solution-------------
If you do not do the SET DEVICE/PATH= command then all of your SAN drives will end up using the same IO path to the SAN and you create a possible IO bottleneck situation.
--------------
Starting with V7.3-1, there is a very lightweight attempt made to spread out the current paths at boot time over all available paths. We keep count of how many devices have their current path set to any given path, and try to keep the number of current paths equally spread over the given paths.
This is a one-time balancing act, however, and over time, it is possible that an imbalance may happen. Also note that there can be many devices doing no I/O; the fact that their path is current doesn't really mean that any load is generated on that path.
As earlier replies have correctly stated, the primary path is merely the first path discovered. In retrospect, it probably would have been better never to have made that
distintion user-visible, since it has caused a fair amount of confusion and generated a lot of questions.
-- Rob (multipath engineer)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-09-2006 07:59 PM
тАО03-09-2006 07:59 PM
Re: Primary vs Current Disk Paths
Rob.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-10-2006 02:05 AM
тАО03-10-2006 02:05 AM
Re: Primary vs Current Disk Paths
We also manually watched the SAN switches for load for the VMS systems and moved some of the heavy I/O devices to use alternate switches. The disks then try to stay on that path. If I have a san switch fail I know it will automatically use the other path for continuous access.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-12-2006 09:31 AM
тАО03-12-2006 09:31 AM
Re: Primary vs Current Disk Paths
Like the previous poster, for switch upgrades/
replacements - we too make sure all paths
are valid. Extraneous work for sure but
you can't always trust things (don't ask).
Rob ... what I would like to see is in
addition to intelligent load balancing
(made mention in other posts in other
forums), is a periodic automatic switch to
ensure IO can go down all paths. What I mean
is if a device had 3 IO paths it would periodically test the others. As it is, you
see current path, all IO has gone down the
current path and you have no indication that
the other paths with 0 IO are valid paths, hence
the need to switch to those paths prior
to a switch upgrade.
I trust VMS path switching. What I would
like to do is point out that IO has gone
down all paths, therefore all paths are
valid therefore this extraneous work of
switching paths is over-kill - forget
about it...
Thanks,
Rob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-12-2006 07:21 PM
тАО03-12-2006 07:21 PM
Re: Primary vs Current Disk Paths
the multipath poller should be polling each path from time to time (see HELP SET DEV/POLL), so you should become aware (via OPCOM messages), if a path is not working.
Volker.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-12-2006 08:12 PM
тАО03-12-2006 08:12 PM
Re: Primary vs Current Disk Paths
The document does help to give an insight into how paths work, though.
Rob.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-13-2006 09:59 AM
тАО03-13-2006 09:59 AM
Re: Primary vs Current Disk Paths
distintion user-visible, since it has caused a fair amount of confusion and generated a lot of questions"
I guess that answers my question - no
really useful info for me in knowing
what the Primary path is/was.
Thanks all