- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- harddisk failures
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-27-2012 11:18 AM
07-27-2012 11:18 AM
i got a customer with a dl380 g7. THe server is less than a year old. I isntalled the os on a mirror. Since the purchase of the server, twice one of the disks already failed. According to hp support due to multiple write errors.
I never noticed a hp server to fail twice within a year.
Anyone a suggestion what can be the cause of this?
Maybe i should change the mirror into a raid 5 (iff possible withou data lost, dont want to reinstall the os again).
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Tags:
- RAID
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-28-2012 01:54 AM
07-28-2012 01:54 AM
SolutionYou should remember that a huge flood in Thailand destroyed a significant part of world-wide hard disk manufacturing capacity last year.
(Wikipedia says Thailand accounts for 25% of the total world-wide hard disk manufacturing capacity.)
I expect that the other hard disk factories around the world have been running at absolute maximum capacity since then. That might have caused some product quality issues here and there. The same would be true in the factories that are restored/rebuilt in a big hurry to get into full production mode.
RAID 5 is not necessarily more fault-tolerant than a mirror - in fact, it is likely to be less so.
If you have a total of 6 disks, with mirroring you can have up to 3 of them fail without losing data, if each failing disk happens to be in a different mirror pair. But in a 6-disk RAID 5, your data will be lost when any 2 disks fail.
For a given number of disks, RAID 5 provides more storage space than mirroring.
The lessons you should take away from this:
1.) RAID is not a backup. A backup is something that is on a separate storage media that is not being used all the time, so it will have a smaller risk of damage. Ideally, at least some of your backups should be in a separate physical location, so that they will not be lost along with the original system if there is a fire or other disaster.
2.) You should monitor your RAID sets, so that you will receive some form of an alert when one of your disks fail. If the server is critical, you might even want to have a spare disk or two at hand, so that you can replace a disk as soon as it fails. If there is a free disk slot, consider installing a hot spare.
3.) Hard disks are mechanical devices, and thus subject to wear and tear. So it is certain that they will eventually fail: this is a fact of life for all system administrators.