- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- Re: Poor latency with Server 2003 and HP nics
ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
1823066
Members
3048
Online
109645
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-30-2005 11:37 PM
тАО10-30-2005 11:37 PM
Poor latency with Server 2003 and HP nics
I'm seeing a trend with all of our DL380 and DL580 servers. When using Server 2003 we are seeing slow response times when doing portpings to other systems. 170 - 200 ms on average. When using Server 2000 the response is 30 - 35 ms. This is affecting web apps, and seems to be related specifically to the gig cards built into the DL series. Has anyone else seen this? All firmware and drivers have been tested from 7.1 to 7.4.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-31-2005 01:11 AM
тАО10-31-2005 01:11 AM
Re: Poor latency with Server 2003 and HP nics
Did you verfied the speed and duplex settings on the server and the switch?
Did you verfied the switch port statistics for errors or collisions?
What is the output of netstat -s in the server?
Did you verfied the switch port statistics for errors or collisions?
What is the output of netstat -s in the server?
Por que hacerlo dificil si es posible hacerlo facil? - Why do it the hard way, when you can do it the easy way?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-31-2005 01:25 AM
тАО10-31-2005 01:25 AM
Re: Poor latency with Server 2003 and HP nics
We have several primary server switches. I have not checked for issues on the switch side because the behavior is so consistent. Regardless of the nic speed, auto/10/100/1000/half/full/fiber/copper or switch it's attached to, all 2003 servers with these nics have the same slow response time. Another kicker is that you go back to NT4, its still better, with 20 - 30 ms response times. Here is a display of netstat -s
IPv4 Statistics
Packets Received = 3719739
Received Header Errors = 0
Received Address Errors = 0
Datagrams Forwarded = 0
Unknown Protocols Received = 0
Received Packets Discarded = 0
Received Packets Delivered = 3719739
Output Requests = 7557965
Routing Discards = 0
Discarded Output Packets = 0
Output Packet No Route = 0
Reassembly Required = 0
Reassembly Successful = 0
Reassembly Failures = 0
Datagrams Successfully Fragmented = 0
Datagrams Failing Fragmentation = 0
Fragments Created = 0
ICMPv4 Statistics
Received Sent
Messages 3557 3827
Errors 0 0
Destination Unreachable 38 5
Time Exceeded 18 0
Parameter Problems 0 0
Source Quenches 0 0
Redirects 0 0
Echos 1293 2529
Echo Replies 2208 1293
Timestamps 0 0
Timestamp Replies 0 0
Address Masks 0 0
Address Mask Replies 0 0
TCP Statistics for IPv4
Active Opens = 17377
Passive Opens = 681
Failed Connection Attempts = 61
Reset Connections = 72
Current Connections = 4
Segments Received = 3260460
Segments Sent = 7158486
Segments Retransmitted = 1085
UDP Statistics for IPv4
Datagrams Received = 424018
No Ports = 65672
Receive Errors = 0
Datagrams Sent = 378481
Any ideas?, thanks!!
IPv4 Statistics
Packets Received = 3719739
Received Header Errors = 0
Received Address Errors = 0
Datagrams Forwarded = 0
Unknown Protocols Received = 0
Received Packets Discarded = 0
Received Packets Delivered = 3719739
Output Requests = 7557965
Routing Discards = 0
Discarded Output Packets = 0
Output Packet No Route = 0
Reassembly Required = 0
Reassembly Successful = 0
Reassembly Failures = 0
Datagrams Successfully Fragmented = 0
Datagrams Failing Fragmentation = 0
Fragments Created = 0
ICMPv4 Statistics
Received Sent
Messages 3557 3827
Errors 0 0
Destination Unreachable 38 5
Time Exceeded 18 0
Parameter Problems 0 0
Source Quenches 0 0
Redirects 0 0
Echos 1293 2529
Echo Replies 2208 1293
Timestamps 0 0
Timestamp Replies 0 0
Address Masks 0 0
Address Mask Replies 0 0
TCP Statistics for IPv4
Active Opens = 17377
Passive Opens = 681
Failed Connection Attempts = 61
Reset Connections = 72
Current Connections = 4
Segments Received = 3260460
Segments Sent = 7158486
Segments Retransmitted = 1085
UDP Statistics for IPv4
Datagrams Received = 424018
No Ports = 65672
Receive Errors = 0
Datagrams Sent = 378481
Any ideas?, thanks!!
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP