HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- Server Management - Systems Insight Manager
- >
- Parallell installations ?
Server Management - Systems Insight Manager
1837504
Members
3597
Online
110117
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-14-2005 07:35 PM
09-14-2005 07:35 PM
Parallell installations ?
Could anyone from HP tell me whether it is possible and/or supported to run 2 parallell installations towards the same SQL database ?
The problem I see with this is the risk for data corruption.
My cause for asking is that I'm looking for alternatives, since our current cluster installation performance has dropped to nothing, getting a view from a query takes between 2-4 minutes (even if the query just contains "get me all servers starting with a"
Logging in usually takes 30 seconds to one minute.
Now I have been doing quite some troubleshooting and coming up with nothing, the servers are idle, the database is idle, and yet performance stinks, so next and only option seems to be reinstallation, and so I'm looking for options.
1. I would very much like to keep the settings, and the question is if they're all stored in the database and I can just save that one ?
2. I need to have a redundant solution and from what I can see clustering just makes the solution complex and slow, and does not work, so I can think of either two parallell installations towards same database, hence my question above, alternatively two parallell installations with 2 independent databases, but that again requires double the amount of diskspace and double the amount of administration.
Is there any other way that I haven't thought of ?
The problem I see with this is the risk for data corruption.
My cause for asking is that I'm looking for alternatives, since our current cluster installation performance has dropped to nothing, getting a view from a query takes between 2-4 minutes (even if the query just contains "get me all servers starting with a"
Logging in usually takes 30 seconds to one minute.
Now I have been doing quite some troubleshooting and coming up with nothing, the servers are idle, the database is idle, and yet performance stinks, so next and only option seems to be reinstallation, and so I'm looking for options.
1. I would very much like to keep the settings, and the question is if they're all stored in the database and I can just save that one ?
2. I need to have a redundant solution and from what I can see clustering just makes the solution complex and slow, and does not work, so I can think of either two parallell installations towards same database, hence my question above, alternatively two parallell installations with 2 independent databases, but that again requires double the amount of diskspace and double the amount of administration.
Is there any other way that I haven't thought of ?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-15-2005 09:19 PM
09-15-2005 09:19 PM
Re: Parallell installations ?
It is possible to point 2 HPSIM to the same database.
Do the following steps for migration:
1. Install the new HPSIM and point that to a new database. (make sure that the new setup uses the same login name and password as in the old setup)
2. After the installation copy the following files from your old setup and paste that in the new setup
a. database.props
b. database.admin
c. globalsettings.ptops
d. database.tpl
e. databaseadmin.tpl
f. databaseadminupd.tpl
g. databaseupdate.tpl
restart the HPSIM service on the new server
Do the following steps for migration:
1. Install the new HPSIM and point that to a new database. (make sure that the new setup uses the same login name and password as in the old setup)
2. After the installation copy the following files from your old setup and paste that in the new setup
a. database.props
b. database.admin
c. globalsettings.ptops
d. database.tpl
e. databaseadmin.tpl
f. databaseadminupd.tpl
g. databaseupdate.tpl
restart the HPSIM service on the new server
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-16-2005 01:19 AM
09-16-2005 01:19 AM
Re: Parallell installations ?
Interesting question. My answer is that it may be little too risky. When the practicality comes into play there is lot many things that drive HPSIM other than the database. The trust relationship, tight integration with of the host that is hosting SIM. I mean there are few other parameters in globalsettings.props like CMS devicekey,entries in nodesecurity.xml, SSH passwords.....and so many others that should be tuned to perfection.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-19-2005 01:31 AM
09-19-2005 01:31 AM
Re: Parallell installations ?
Ok, so a parallell installation with 2 completely separate databases would be preferrable I take it. I guessed that would be the solution :)
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP