- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Re: CDP "punch-through"
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1752753
Members
4770
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-26-2007 07:10 PM
тАО09-26-2007 07:10 PM
CDP "punch-through"
All,
I have this setup:
[HP2626](25)-------[HP5304]------(26)[HP2626]
From the rightmost 2626 I do a 'sho cdp nei det' and get this result:
CDP neighbors information
Port : 26
Device ID : 00 14 38 6a 0a 00
Address Type : IP
Address : 10.20.15.30
Platform : HP J4850A ProCurve Switch 5304XL, revision E.10.37, ROM ...
Capability : Switch
Device Port : 28
Version : HP J4850A ProCurve Switch 5304XL, revision E.10.37, ROM ...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Port : 26
Device ID : h05renas1(000f20-16e3c0)
Address Type : IP
Address : 10.20.15.11
Platform : Revision H.08.53 /sw/code/build/fish(f04)HP 2626
Capability : Switch
Device Port : 25
Version : Revision H.08.53 /sw/code/build/fish(f04)HP 2626
i.e I see the CDP info from the other 2626 through the 5304. Thus, the 5304 both replies to CDP and is transparent. I can't seem to remember having seen this before. Anyone have clue here?
I have this setup:
[HP2626](25)-------[HP5304]------(26)[HP2626]
From the rightmost 2626 I do a 'sho cdp nei det' and get this result:
CDP neighbors information
Port : 26
Device ID : 00 14 38 6a 0a 00
Address Type : IP
Address : 10.20.15.30
Platform : HP J4850A ProCurve Switch 5304XL, revision E.10.37, ROM ...
Capability : Switch
Device Port : 28
Version : HP J4850A ProCurve Switch 5304XL, revision E.10.37, ROM ...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Port : 26
Device ID : h05renas1(000f20-16e3c0)
Address Type : IP
Address : 10.20.15.11
Platform : Revision H.08.53 /sw/code/build/fish(f04)HP 2626
Capability : Switch
Device Port : 25
Version : Revision H.08.53 /sw/code/build/fish(f04)HP 2626
i.e I see the CDP info from the other 2626 through the 5304. Thus, the 5304 both replies to CDP and is transparent. I can't seem to remember having seen this before. Anyone have clue here?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-26-2007 07:32 PM
тАО09-26-2007 07:32 PM
Re: CDP "punch-through"
Since CDP is no longer supported on the newer firmware releases I'm not too surprised that the 5300 is simply forwarding them.
If possible I'd recommend you update all of the switches and use LLDP instead.
If possible I'd recommend you update all of the switches and use LLDP instead.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-26-2007 07:35 PM
тАО09-26-2007 07:35 PM
Re: CDP "punch-through"
Actually I have seen this on/through another switch as well; but that was a Cisco of rather obscure character.
But - if CDP is no longer supported on the E.10.37 - why will it respond to requests at all?
But - if CDP is no longer supported on the E.10.37 - why will it respond to requests at all?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-26-2007 09:12 PM
тАО09-26-2007 09:12 PM
Re: CDP "punch-through"
"But - if CDP is no longer supported on the E.10.37 - why will it respond to requests at all?"
LLDP packets are used to populate the CDP neighbour information. I think it's sending LLDP and is transparent to CDP.
Some switches have readonly (rather than no) CDP support, with later firmware. I think that applies to the rightmost 2626.
I don't think that CDP packets update the LLDP MIBS however, so "show lldp info remote" probably will show only the 5304. You could also turn CDP off with "no cdp run".
LLDP packets are used to populate the CDP neighbour information. I think it's sending LLDP and is transparent to CDP.
Some switches have readonly (rather than no) CDP support, with later firmware. I think that applies to the rightmost 2626.
I don't think that CDP packets update the LLDP MIBS however, so "show lldp info remote" probably will show only the 5304. You could also turn CDP off with "no cdp run".
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP