- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Switches, Hubs, Modems
- >
- Cisco 3650G + DL380 Etherchannel problems
Switches, Hubs, and Modems
1753731
Members
4596
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-07-2007 09:50 PM
11-07-2007 09:50 PM
Cisco 3650G + DL380 Etherchannel problems
I try to connect Cisco 3650G and DL380 by 2Gb channel. Make ether-channel at Cisco. Put ether-channel in trunk mode. Almost everything is OK, but Netlogon produced 5719 error (GPO is not work, domain user-relayed services not start, Exchange 2007 produced many error). Try everything from http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=5719&eventno=104&source=NETLOGON&phase=1. Install new drivers from HP. Not help.
Ok. Change ether-channel mode to access like Cisco recommended (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_configuration_example09186a008089a821.shtml). After restart network is not work. HP Network Team Utility and Cisco show that all interfaces are up and everything is work. But I can’t ping any computer in network. Pull out/insert jacks in switch and everything is work. But I can’t reinsert jack after each server reboot.
Could somebody recommend something else or robust 2 gb-channel between Hp DL380 and Cisco 3560G is not possible.
Ok. Change ether-channel mode to access like Cisco recommended (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_configuration_example09186a008089a821.shtml). After restart network is not work. HP Network Team Utility and Cisco show that all interfaces are up and everything is work. But I can’t ping any computer in network. Pull out/insert jacks in switch and everything is work. But I can’t reinsert jack after each server reboot.
Could somebody recommend something else or robust 2 gb-channel between Hp DL380 and Cisco 3560G is not possible.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2007 08:48 PM
11-12-2007 08:48 PM
Re: Cisco 3650G + DL380 Etherchannel problems
Hi Viacheslav,
you're doing this with an LACP port-channel interface on the Cisco side and LACP teaming on the DL380 side hopefully? I haven't had issues with that so far, but there is a lot of variance here with DL380 generations (I haven't tested this yet with G5) and Cisco IOS versions (though I cannot remember a bad one that would bork on LACP).
Just remember that 802.3 link aggregation will not give you the n-fold bandwidth except in a statistical way. Details depend on the number of MAC addresses in use on both sides of the aggregate.
HTH,
Andre.
you're doing this with an LACP port-channel interface on the Cisco side and LACP teaming on the DL380 side hopefully? I haven't had issues with that so far, but there is a lot of variance here with DL380 generations (I haven't tested this yet with G5) and Cisco IOS versions (though I cannot remember a bad one that would bork on LACP).
Just remember that 802.3 link aggregation will not give you the n-fold bandwidth except in a statistical way. Details depend on the number of MAC addresses in use on both sides of the aggregate.
HTH,
Andre.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP