1834644 Members
2909 Online
110069 Solutions
New Discussion

Cluster Servers

 
iamthestar
Advisor

Cluster Servers

Am a newbi can you please let me know, i wanna have a clustering server, with windows2003, is it neccessary to have the two servers of same hardware configuration or i can use the two different hardware. thanx
7 REPLIES 7
Stuart Abramson
Trusted Contributor

Re: Cluster Servers

You're in the wrong forum. this is unix.
Steven E. Protter
Exalted Contributor

Re: Cluster Servers

You may be in the right forum.

Depending on what you want to cluster, Unix might work MUCH better than Micro$oft.

SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
iamthestar
Advisor

Re: Cluster Servers

Ok sorry, leave the server, i wanna have unix ok, now tell me is it neccesary to have same hardware configuration for two servers;
Steven Clementi
Honored Contributor

Re: Cluster Servers

To actually answer the question...

No, you really do not have to have the same exact hardware, at east not in a Windows cluster though it is best practice to have the same spec's on all your nodes.

You need to consider this...

Assuming you have a DL380G4 and a DL360G4. The 380 has 12GB ram andthe 360 has 6GB ram. You can cluster the 2 systems, and make the 380 your primary active node. But if you have to failover, you will be running on a server that has less resources then your primary.

At the very least, you should have the same amount of memory and other resources needed to support the clustered application. If you want to go overboard on the primary and have JUST enough on the standby, it would work. Not as good, but it would work.


Steven
Steven Clementi
HP Master ASE, Storage, Servers, and Clustering
MCSE (NT 4.0, W2K, W2K3)
VCP (ESX2, Vi3, vSphere4, vSphere5, vSphere 6.x)
RHCE
NPP3 (Nutanix Platform Professional)
Ivan Ferreira
Honored Contributor

Re: Cluster Servers

See this page:

http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/planning/server/clustersteps.asp


"All hardware should be identical, slot for slot, card for card, for all nodes. This will make configuration easier and eliminate potential compatibility problems."
Por que hacerlo dificil si es posible hacerlo facil? - Why do it the hard way, when you can do it the easy way?
Jan van den Ende
Honored Contributor

Re: Cluster Servers

Oops!

compare that to VMS clustering:

ANY system running VMS can cluster with ANY other system running VMS, as long as the VMS versions are no more than one version level different, up to a supported maximum of 96 nodes....

Proost.

Have one on me.

jpe
Don't rust yours pelled jacker to fine doll missed aches.
Ivan Ferreira
Honored Contributor

Re: Cluster Servers

That happens only with Microsoft.

With trucluster of Red Hat Cluster, or any other cluster for Linux, the machines doesn't have to be "the same".
Por que hacerlo dificil si es posible hacerlo facil? - Why do it the hard way, when you can do it the easy way?