- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- SGLX and RHCS: fence device Vs lock lun
Operating System - Linux
1754136
Members
2861
Online
108811
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-13-2006 10:06 AM
тАО06-13-2006 10:06 AM
SGLX and RHCS: fence device Vs lock lun
Hello all,
The latest RHCS use power switch/SAN switch/remote controller as it's fencing device and removed the support of quorum LUN which exists in previous RHELv3.
I just wonder in a two node cluster configuration, compare SGLX with lock lUN and RHCS with it's own fencing mechanism, which one is more reliable? Especially when the heartbeat is broken(even if the bonding is failed).I've read from Red Hat cluster mail list that Red Hat cluster's new fencing mechanism has less latency than quorum LUN.
Regards,
Jun,
The latest RHCS use power switch/SAN switch/remote controller as it's fencing device and removed the support of quorum LUN which exists in previous RHELv3.
I just wonder in a two node cluster configuration, compare SGLX with lock lUN and RHCS with it's own fencing mechanism, which one is more reliable? Especially when the heartbeat is broken(even if the bonding is failed).I've read from Red Hat cluster mail list that Red Hat cluster's new fencing mechanism has less latency than quorum LUN.
Regards,
Jun,
just for fun
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-13-2006 05:57 PM
тАО06-13-2006 05:57 PM
Re: SGLX and RHCS: fence device Vs lock lun
Shalom Jun,
You can actually operate RHCS without a valid fence device with 4.0.
I work with both SG and RHCS and find them both to be quite difficult. Its important to use only supported hardware with RH, should you choose to use a fence device. I've often had to write custom fence control/acknowledge scripts which I really should not have to do.
The Lock disk is solid, reliable and I've never had to write custom code to check it under SG.
SEP
You can actually operate RHCS without a valid fence device with 4.0.
I work with both SG and RHCS and find them both to be quite difficult. Its important to use only supported hardware with RH, should you choose to use a fence device. I've often had to write custom fence control/acknowledge scripts which I really should not have to do.
The Lock disk is solid, reliable and I've never had to write custom code to check it under SG.
SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-14-2006 06:04 AM
тАО06-14-2006 06:04 AM
Re: SGLX and RHCS: fence device Vs lock lun
Thanks Steven,
Does Redhat consider their latest fencing mechanisms is more "advanced" than previous quorum disk/lun technology or compare to other company's traditional solution(such as SGLX)?
I read more issue reports from RHCS mailing lists about fencing, so it seems a bit interesting of RHCS's design & fence implementation.
By the way, do you know if there are more community resource(web forum, mailing list, newsgroup) that dedicate to HP MC/SG(for Unix and Linux)? Appreciate if you can share.
HP's ITRC forum is the only resource I've found that have a board to discuss MC/SG.
Regards,
Does Redhat consider their latest fencing mechanisms is more "advanced" than previous quorum disk/lun technology or compare to other company's traditional solution(such as SGLX)?
I read more issue reports from RHCS mailing lists about fencing, so it seems a bit interesting of RHCS's design & fence implementation.
By the way, do you know if there are more community resource(web forum, mailing list, newsgroup) that dedicate to HP MC/SG(for Unix and Linux)? Appreciate if you can share.
HP's ITRC forum is the only resource I've found that have a board to discuss MC/SG.
Regards,
just for fun
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP