- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- Virtual Connect Uplink set shutdown on cisco due t...
BladeSystem - General
1821808
Members
3259
Online
109638
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-09-2008 03:32 AM
тАО08-09-2008 03:32 AM
Virtual Connect Uplink set shutdown on cisco due to BPDU
We have two pairs of VC Enet modules.
Modules 1,2,5 and 6
We are waiting on the 10G CX stacking links to arrive (seems a commonly missed config item). So we have temporarily used Cat6 crossovers to link the modules vertically. i.e. module 1 to 5 and module 2 to 6)
We have only one SUS defined on 1 VC module.
All was working well (a few days running sucesfully in this config) until tonight when the cisco 3750 that the blade uplinks to shutdwon both ports in the portchannel group. The cisco detected a spanning loop:
SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_BPDUGUARD: Received BPDU on port Port-channel10 with BPDU Guard enabled. Disabling port.
I'm not sure if it is a coincidence, but I upgraded the Onboadrd Admin to 2.25 (Rel 1 Aug 08) today.
(The blade unit is not in production yet, so please forgive the non-redundant SUS configuration)
I tried just bringing one port up at a time, and only having one member in the SUS. Neither fixed the problem.
I have (temporarily) fixed the issue by powering off the second set of VC Enet modules (5,6)
Can anyone help as to where I have gone wrong with the setup?
Regards,
Andrew
Modules 1,2,5 and 6
We are waiting on the 10G CX stacking links to arrive (seems a commonly missed config item). So we have temporarily used Cat6 crossovers to link the modules vertically. i.e. module 1 to 5 and module 2 to 6)
We have only one SUS defined on 1 VC module.
All was working well (a few days running sucesfully in this config) until tonight when the cisco 3750 that the blade uplinks to shutdwon both ports in the portchannel group. The cisco detected a spanning loop:
SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_BPDUGUARD: Received BPDU on port Port-channel10 with BPDU Guard enabled. Disabling port.
I'm not sure if it is a coincidence, but I upgraded the Onboadrd Admin to 2.25 (Rel 1 Aug 08) today.
(The blade unit is not in production yet, so please forgive the non-redundant SUS configuration)
I tried just bringing one port up at a time, and only having one member in the SUS. Neither fixed the problem.
I have (temporarily) fixed the issue by powering off the second set of VC Enet modules (5,6)
Can anyone help as to where I have gone wrong with the setup?
Regards,
Andrew
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-13-2008 04:53 AM
тАО08-13-2008 04:53 AM
Re: Virtual Connect Uplink set shutdown on cisco due to BPDU
VC behaves as an edge device on the network and since VC does not participate in the
spanning tree, it doesn├в t transmit BPDUs on VC uplinks. Anyways you can check the customer advisory below.
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01277065тМй=en&cc=us&taskId=101&prodSeriesId=3331044&prodTypeId=15351
rgds,
spanning tree, it doesn├в t transmit BPDUs on VC uplinks. Anyways you can check the customer advisory below.
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01277065тМй=en&cc=us&taskId=101&prodSeriesId=3331044&prodTypeId=15351
rgds,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-14-2008 05:12 PM
тАО08-14-2008 05:12 PM
Re: Virtual Connect Uplink set shutdown on cisco due to BPDU
thanks,
The firmware is more recent than in the advisory. The nature of the spanning tree loop was more than transient.
Has anyone else come across this?
The firmware is more recent than in the advisory. The nature of the spanning tree loop was more than transient.
Has anyone else come across this?
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP