- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Re: EVA's & Disk addition - net computations
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-24-2007 10:17 AM
тАО11-24-2007 10:17 AM
I need to find a document that discusses the space loss for parity, overhead, and other net losses that occur with a SAN.
For instance, when you add a 146GB, net space availability is shown to be about 136GB. I believe that this depends on sparring, number of disks in disk group, etc. but want to know for sure.
Please let me know if you are aware of a document that lays this out.
Thanks!
Suzanne ...................
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-24-2007 07:49 PM
тАО11-24-2007 07:49 PM
Re: EVA's & Disk addition - net computations
Not a document, but the StorageWorks sizing tool available here is very useful for this sort of thing:
http://h30144.www3.hp.com/SWD%20Sizer%20Web%20Site/
To explain your example, disks are sold in metric GB ie 1,000,000,000 bytes, whereas most storage systems actually display things in binary GB (GiB) 1,073,741,824 bytes.
Therefore you convert between the two with his multiplier:
1000000000 / 1073741824 = 0.9313
146 x 0.9313 = 135.9698
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Rob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-25-2007 04:08 AM
тАО11-25-2007 04:08 AM
Re: EVA's & Disk addition - net computations
your disk size is 146000000000 byte.
146000000000/(1024*1024*1024)=136GB.
Hasan.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-25-2007 08:50 AM
тАО11-25-2007 08:50 AM
Re: EVA's & Disk addition - net computations
But to clarify, I was referring to the available disk space difference computations in configuring vraid1 as opposed to vraid5. i.e. parity loss, redundancy loss, etc.
For instance, if I have a diskgroup with 24 146GB drives. I have a project request for quote coming along needing 'X' GB's of space. I need to be able to accurately define how many drives they need to purchase to provide the required space. This includes net loss for parity and redundancy to accommodate for vraid1 and vraid5 needs.
In the past, I have noted that it depends on the number of drives in disk group, the size of those drives, etc.
I would like to be more sure of my answers to project owners to protect my storage resources.
Ideas, docs, refernces?
Suzanne
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-26-2007 07:50 AM
тАО11-26-2007 07:50 AM
Re: EVA's & Disk addition - net computations
you should look at thread
http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=637957
Hasan.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-30-2007 04:11 AM
тАО11-30-2007 04:11 AM
Solution1. Nameplate capacity on drives is in powers of 10 (HW GB), EVA allocates space in powers of 2 (SW GB).
2. Best Practice is use no more than 90% occupancy.
3. EVA RAID 1 overhead is 100% (need 2 GB free space to create a 1 GB VDisk)
4. EVA RAID5 overhead is 25% (need 1.25 GB free space to create a 1 GB VDisk)
5. Sparing is at the Disk Group level, if you add a new drive you will see the SW capacity
6. Add drives in Pairs to see an increase in available VRAID1 space, unpaired drives do not hold any VRAID1 data.
Here is a table of Disks per TB by RAID level at 90% occupancy, (after #1 and #2 are accounted for):
I have entered it comma separted, you can paste it into Excel and it should parse correctly:
HW, SW,90%, R0, R5, R1
146.8,136.7,123.1,8.4,10.5,16.7
300.0,279.4,251.5,4.1,5.2,8.2
500.1,465.8,419.2,2.5,3.2,4.9,
750.2,698.6,628.8,1.7,2.2,3.3
Remember that the Spare Space calculation is based on the largest drive in the group, so adding two 300GB drives to a group of 146s will not add 560 GB of free space. At Single protection you would get about 280GB back. At Double you would *loose* an additional 560 GB of free space!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-02-2007 02:23 AM
тАО12-02-2007 02:23 AM
Re: EVA's & Disk addition - net computations
A couple of corrections...
> 2. Best Practice is use no more than 90% occupancy.
That best practice is now out of date. Current best practice is to leave 5GB free in the disk group.
> 4. EVA RAID5 overhead is 25% (need 1.25 GB free space to create a 1 GB VDisk)
I thought VRaid5 overhead was 20%, not 25%.
Cheers,
Rob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-02-2007 09:55 AM
тАО12-02-2007 09:55 AM
Re: EVA's & Disk addition - net computations
I have BC & CA so I am proposing for the purchase of 300's snapcloning stuff gradually from the 146 DG over to the new faster 300 DG.
additional comments?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-02-2007 11:44 AM
тАО12-02-2007 11:44 AM
Re: EVA's & Disk addition - net computations
you also consider iopersec that storage can do besides capacity.
you will buy half of the required disk if you choose 300Gb. it will decrease also storage iopersec capacity.
Hasan.
please also assign points if the information is helpfull for you.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-02-2007 03:39 PM
тАО12-02-2007 03:39 PM