HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Additional information seen in ioscan
Operating System - HP-UX
1833059
Members
2423
Online
110049
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-18-2008 01:33 AM
01-18-2008 01:33 AM
Hi
One of my HPUX servers has recently had 2 LUNS presented from a 9990. These are usable and working as I would expect, however ioscan on the server shows the following.
ext_bus 4 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0 fcd_vbus CLAIMED INTERFACE FCP Arr
ay Interface
target 8 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.0 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 4 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.0.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
OPEN-V
/dev/dsk/c4t0d0 /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0
disk 5 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.0.1 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
OPEN-V
/dev/dsk/c4t0d1 /dev/rdsk/c4t0d1
target 10 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.1 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 6 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.1.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 11 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.2 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 7 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.2.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 12 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.3 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 8 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.3.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 13 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.4 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 9 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.4.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 14 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.5 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 15 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.6 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 11 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.6.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 16 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.7 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 12 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.7.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 17 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.8 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 13 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.8.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 18 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.9 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 14 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.9.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 19 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.10 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 15 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.10.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 20 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.11 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 16 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.11.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 21 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.12 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 17 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.12.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 22 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.13 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 23 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.14 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 19 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.14.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 24 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.15 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 20 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.15.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
The storage guys have advised that only the two luns have been added to the lun security tables, what we are wondering is what are all these extra targets seen (DISK-SUBSYSTEM). I don't believe these luns as they only contain the target, unless there is a lot of LUN0's !
Any thoughts ?
Is there a setting missing on the 9990 ?
One of my HPUX servers has recently had 2 LUNS presented from a 9990. These are usable and working as I would expect, however ioscan on the server shows the following.
ext_bus 4 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0 fcd_vbus CLAIMED INTERFACE FCP Arr
ay Interface
target 8 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.0 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 4 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.0.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
OPEN-V
/dev/dsk/c4t0d0 /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0
disk 5 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.0.1 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
OPEN-V
/dev/dsk/c4t0d1 /dev/rdsk/c4t0d1
target 10 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.1 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 6 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.1.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 11 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.2 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 7 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.2.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 12 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.3 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 8 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.3.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 13 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.4 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 9 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.4.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 14 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.5 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 15 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.6 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 11 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.6.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 16 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.7 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 12 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.7.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 17 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.8 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 13 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.8.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 18 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.9 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 14 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.9.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 19 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.10 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 15 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.10.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 20 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.11 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 16 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.11.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 21 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.12 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 17 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.12.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 22 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.13 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 23 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.14 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 19 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.14.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
target 24 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.15 tgt CLAIMED DEVICE
disk 20 0/4/1/0.7.0.0.0.15.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HITACHI
DISK-SUBSYSTEM
The storage guys have advised that only the two luns have been added to the lun security tables, what we are wondering is what are all these extra targets seen (DISK-SUBSYSTEM). I don't believe these luns as they only contain the target, unless there is a lot of LUN0's !
Any thoughts ?
Is there a setting missing on the 9990 ?
Argh ye land lovers !
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-18-2008 07:25 AM
01-18-2008 07:25 AM
Solution
These are "place holders" for future LUNs - no need to worry.
A special "mode" setting on the array can avoid this behaviour, but it is not a problem.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
A special "mode" setting on the array can avoid this behaviour, but it is not a problem.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-18-2008 08:44 AM
01-18-2008 08:44 AM
Re: Additional information seen in ioscan
As already stated these are placeholder aka ghost LUNs. They exist so that other LUNs on that target can be scanned. Another deviation from the regular LUNs is that diskinfo returns a size of zero for these ghost LUNs.
~hope it helps
~hope it helps
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-20-2008 12:47 PM
01-20-2008 12:47 PM
Re: Additional information seen in ioscan
thanks , there was a setting on the array showing mask ghost luns.
Argh ye land lovers !
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP