HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Network - Dual Interfaces with different host name...
Operating System - HP-UX
1832898
Members
2391
Online
110048
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-12-2001 12:40 PM
07-12-2001 12:40 PM
Network - Dual Interfaces with different host names on Veritas Master Server
I am running two interfaces in a HP9000/800 T520, HP-UX 10.20 with two seperate host names and seperate networks, a 10 network (backup) and a 209 (user)network. I have configured the netconf file to show specific entries for each interface and their route information to include ROUTE_DESTINATION, ROUTE_MASK, and ROUTE_GATEWAY etc.
The trouble exists when I start a Veritas backup the 209 address of the T520 server is transmitted to the 10 network to a ACSLS robotic server. The ACSLS server is only attached to the 10 network so It can not resolve the 209 address and posts an error.
How can I totally seperate traffic on the networks thus stopping the server form sending the 209 IP down the 10 network?
As a patch I have added a route on the ACSLS server to point back to the T520 for resolution, but I will not be able to leave the route for any length of time.
The trouble exists when I start a Veritas backup the 209 address of the T520 server is transmitted to the 10 network to a ACSLS robotic server. The ACSLS server is only attached to the 10 network so It can not resolve the 209 address and posts an error.
How can I totally seperate traffic on the networks thus stopping the server form sending the 209 IP down the 10 network?
As a patch I have added a route on the ACSLS server to point back to the T520 for resolution, but I will not be able to leave the route for any length of time.
There's know place like ~/.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-17-2001 05:14 AM
07-17-2001 05:14 AM
Re: Network - Dual Interfaces with different host names on Veritas Master Server
Hi Rick,
To me it seems that the backup configuration uses the alias that is on the User network. The T520 will route ok to the backup server, but in its configuration is probably the alias on the user network that it cannot reach. You can do two things:
-Rename the alias for the user network of the T520 to the backup network alias on the backup server
- Add a route for the user network that points to the backup network ( I know this works on HPUX):
ROUTE_DESTINATION[1]=209.X.X.X #IP of T520 user
ROUTE_GATEWAY[1]=10.X.X.X #IP of T520 bck
ROUE_COUNT[1]=O
This will make all traffic to the 209 IP address go to the 10 IP address of the HPUX system.
To me it seems that the backup configuration uses the alias that is on the User network. The T520 will route ok to the backup server, but in its configuration is probably the alias on the user network that it cannot reach. You can do two things:
-Rename the alias for the user network of the T520 to the backup network alias on the backup server
- Add a route for the user network that points to the backup network ( I know this works on HPUX):
ROUTE_DESTINATION[1]=209.X.X.X #IP of T520 user
ROUTE_GATEWAY[1]=10.X.X.X #IP of T520 bck
ROUE_COUNT[1]=O
This will make all traffic to the 209 IP address go to the 10 IP address of the HPUX system.
The surest sign that life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP