- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Sharing DLT with 2 servers?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2000 11:57 AM
12-15-2000 11:57 AM
Does anyone know if I can daisy-chain two DLT tape drive together, where one DLT is attached to HOSTA and the other is attached to HOSTB.
If the SCSI IDs are set so there is no conflict, can this be done so both servers can see and use both tape drives?
This seems like it would work (similar to Service Guard).
Has anyone tried this? Does anyone know why it would NOT work?
Thanks in advanced,
JLS
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2000 12:02 PM
12-15-2000 12:02 PM
Re: Sharing DLT with 2 servers?
If that's the question, the answer is YES.
/rcw
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2000 12:04 PM
12-15-2000 12:04 PM
Re: Sharing DLT with 2 servers?
I do not think it will work - you are considering setting up two adapter/controllers (servers) on a single SCSI bus - there can only be one SCSI adapter/controller (and terminator) on a SCSI chain... otherwise, there would be contention for signals sent down the wire.
what you could do is to put both on one server and remotely use them from the second server.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2000 12:07 PM
12-15-2000 12:07 PM
Re: Sharing DLT with 2 servers?
If your setup was something like the following, it may work. No promises though.
Server A (SCSI Controller ID 7)<-->DLT Drive1 (SCSI ID 6)<-->DLT Drive2 (SCSI ID5)<-->Server B (SCSI ID 4)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2000 12:12 PM
12-15-2000 12:12 PM
Re: Sharing DLT with 2 servers?
How does Service Guard get around the one controller on a SCSI chain? Isn't this how SG works -- HOSTA is attached to a disk and HOSTB is attached to the same disk.
What I am trying to do is the same this only use tape drives instead of disks.
Any thoughts?
JLS
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2000 12:19 PM
12-15-2000 12:19 PM
Re: Sharing DLT with 2 servers?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2000 12:27 PM
12-15-2000 12:27 PM
Re: Sharing DLT with 2 servers?
I just looked at my Service Guard servers and both servers have their respective SCSI initiator ID set to 7. I am confused, from what I am being told, wouldn't this cause a SCSI conflict? Or is it because the volume group they share is inactive on one server while active on the other? (Just thinking out load)
If I need to, how would I go about changing the iniiator's SCSI ID? I thought it was "hardcoded" to 7.
I really appreciate everyone's help. And I will be assigning points. :-)
JLS
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2000 12:37 PM
12-15-2000 12:37 PM
Re: Sharing DLT with 2 servers?
A couple of the responses talk about how to go about changing the SCSI ID of the controller.
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,1150,0x37ac14a24fd1d4118fef0090279cd0f9,00.html
I hope this helps.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2000 12:44 PM
12-15-2000 12:44 PM
Re: Sharing DLT with 2 servers?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2000 03:21 PM
12-15-2000 03:21 PM
Re: Sharing DLT with 2 servers?
Each host has a fibre channel interface. These are connected to a FC/SCSI Multiplexor (A3511A). Then on the back side of the multiplexor there can be up to 4 SCSI interfaces. Connect these to your tape drives.
Each host sees both tape drives. I am using it with 2 DLT libraries, each having 2 DLT8000 drives. In my case each host sees both libraries, 40 tapes, and all 4 drives. Gives me a lot of flexibility in scheduling and running my backups.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-15-2000 06:26 PM
12-15-2000 06:26 PM
SolutionThe issue that still remains is how do you control things to make sure that both machines don't attempt to use the same device at the same time? There are a variety of methods of doing this (lock file flags, etc). My guess is that the OS would complain if it found the device busy (but I'm not sure how it would handle it). But there is the posibility that the device might not necessarily be busy all the time during an evolution (for example a tape change). The bottom line is that some form of locking scheme will be needed.