- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Strange error message: cannot validate NVM
Operating System - HP-UX
1820475
Members
3194
Online
109624
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2005 04:42 AM
тАО01-24-2005 04:42 AM
Hi,
I just noticed the following message in dmesg in a vpar (SD-64).
Jan 24 18:35:23 hxx0142 vmunix: entry 0000000000000001 - major is 31, mi
nor is 0x10000; start = 1215328, size = 3145728
Jan 24 18:35:23 hxx0142 vmunix: read_ss_nvm: Cannot validate NVM - -2
I found this error in the following thread, but the author was searching for something different...
http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=716493758+1106588296880+28353475&threadId=210276
I guess NVM is 'non-volatile-memory' - but which one, and why can't it be read?
Does anyone have a hint on this?
I just noticed the following message in dmesg in a vpar (SD-64).
Jan 24 18:35:23 hxx0142 vmunix: entry 0000000000000001 - major is 31, mi
nor is 0x10000; start = 1215328, size = 3145728
Jan 24 18:35:23 hxx0142 vmunix: read_ss_nvm: Cannot validate NVM - -2
I found this error in the following thread, but the author was searching for something different...
http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=716493758+1106588296880+28353475&threadId=210276
I guess NVM is 'non-volatile-memory' - but which one, and why can't it be read?
Does anyone have a hint on this?
yesterday I stood at the edge. Today I'm one step ahead.
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2005 05:02 AM
тАО01-24-2005 05:02 AM
Re: Strange error message: cannot validate NVM
I have that in all my vpars dmesg's and my systems are cranking along.
post a call to HP.
live free or die
harry d brown jr
Live Free or Die
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2005 05:07 AM
тАО01-24-2005 05:07 AM
Re: Strange error message: cannot validate NVM
I'll open a call tomorrow, it's already after hour support time here in germany and I don't wanna disturb anyone that late.
But good to know this is 'regular' behaviour, I already assumed it must be some component that's inaccessible to vpars.
I'll post back on the reason when I hear from them.
Thanks!
But good to know this is 'regular' behaviour, I already assumed it must be some component that's inaccessible to vpars.
I'll post back on the reason when I hear from them.
Thanks!
yesterday I stood at the edge. Today I'm one step ahead.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2005 06:12 AM
тАО01-24-2005 06:12 AM
Solution
This is the result of a call made by VPARs and can be ignored.
More specifically from some research:
The current implementation of vpar simply passes this
call to the PDC, so it really depends whether the PDC
implemented this call.
I have found a table in vpar design doc which says that
N/L class systems do not support PDC_PAT_NVOLATILE_VERIFY option
of PDC_PAT_NVOLATILE. Thus the returned value is
define PDC_RET_NE_OPT LONG(-2) /* Non-existent option */
So to sum up, this message is normal to appear on N/L class
systems and doesn't present any harm.
The next releases of vpmon could handle this call internally
which would avoid the message, there is no definite plan we could
tell to customer however.
More specifically from some research:
The current implementation of vpar simply passes this
call to the PDC, so it really depends whether the PDC
implemented this call.
I have found a table in vpar design doc which says that
N/L class systems do not support PDC_PAT_NVOLATILE_VERIFY option
of PDC_PAT_NVOLATILE. Thus the returned value is
define PDC_RET_NE_OPT LONG(-2) /* Non-existent option */
So to sum up, this message is normal to appear on N/L class
systems and doesn't present any harm.
The next releases of vpmon could handle this call internally
which would avoid the message, there is no definite plan we could
tell to customer however.
"Well, actually, she is a rocket scientist" -- Steve Martin in "Roxanne"
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP