- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - Linux
- >
- Re: ntpd dead but subsys locked error
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2004 08:18 AM
11-22-2004 08:18 AM
ntpd dead but subsys locked error
I have several machines that are supposed to be running ntp on them but for some reason are unable to do so. When I run the /etc/init.d/ntpd status command, I get the following message:
I have not seen this before, and could use some help. All machines in question are running Red Hat 8.0. The ntp.conf files have been configured to have the servers sync with a particular time server.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2004 08:19 AM
11-22-2004 08:19 AM
Re: ntpd dead but subsys locked error
ntpd dead but subsys locked
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2004 09:33 AM
11-22-2004 09:33 AM
Re: ntpd dead but subsys locked error
Check the logs file, there may be clues as to why it dies.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2004 07:16 PM
11-22-2004 07:16 PM
Re: ntpd dead but subsys locked error
2) did you try "service ntpd restart"?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2004 07:59 PM
11-22-2004 07:59 PM
Re: ntpd dead but subsys locked error
please post your ntp.conf
best regards,
johannes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-23-2004 01:02 AM
11-23-2004 01:02 AM
Re: ntpd dead but subsys locked error
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-23-2004 01:12 AM
11-23-2004 01:12 AM
Re: ntpd dead but subsys locked error
- did you try to check ntpd status by "ps -ef|grep ntp" ?
- upgrade with last RHL8.0 paches may be useful
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-23-2004 02:29 AM
11-23-2004 02:29 AM
Re: ntpd dead but subsys locked error
I ran the service ntpd restart command, and it generated the same error message that was mentioned in a previous e-mail. I also ran the ps -ef |grep ntp command, and the output was the following:
nptd -U ntp
Regarding the service patches for Red Hat 8.0, can you specify which one(s) would be of use here? Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-23-2004 02:38 AM
11-23-2004 02:38 AM
Re: ntpd dead but subsys locked error
try run " ntpq -c pe" in order to check ntpd status.
see for more http://www.fifi.org/doc/ntp-doc/html/debug.htm NTP Debugging Techniques
2) I sugest to install the latest available for RHL8.0 "ntp" package
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-23-2004 11:03 AM
11-23-2004 11:03 AM
Re: ntpd dead but subsys locked error
You can try getting /etc/init.d/ntpd to run ntpdate to update your system time. To do this put IP addresses of your NTP servers in /etc/ntp/step-tickers file.
# echo "
# /etc/init.d/ntpd start
You should also check that your NTP servers are functional with 'ntpq -p'.
# /usr/sbin/ntpq -p
To check if your local system time has been synced run 'ntpq -p' without IP address.
# /usr/sbin/ntpq -p
*
If the output line starts with asterisk it means that your system time has been synced with NTP server.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-13-2004 03:47 AM
12-13-2004 03:47 AM
Re: ntpd dead but subsys locked error
Here are some tips:
1) Run ntpdate
2) Once you have run ntpdate, run sethwclock (rhel2.1) or hwclock --systohc (rhel 3.0) to set your hardware clock to the system time.
Hope this helps.
--Anu
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-13-2004 03:54 AM
12-13-2004 03:54 AM
Re: ntpd dead but subsys locked error
Chris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-14-2004 12:54 AM
12-14-2004 12:54 AM
Re: ntpd dead but subsys locked error
Thank-you all for your replies. I came up with a "novel" solution to the problem. The Webmin administration utility includes a program that works with NTP and aids with the synchroniza- tion of software and system clocks on the systems in question. Once I installed the program and configured it accordingly, NTP worked fine.
Admittedly this is a "roughshod" approach to resolving this issue.