HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: queues+clustering
Operating System - OpenVMS
1828361
Members
3977
Online
109976
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-25-2005 07:39 AM
04-25-2005 07:39 AM
Re: queues+clustering
1. Multiple queue managers: We had a cluster with multiple queue manager files. One of the queue managers got confused and one of the queue manager files kept growing.
2. We find that using non-local disks for clusters works better if multiple systems have access to the system disk(s). Then if one system file disk server is brought down the cluster can still run. We often use the smaller local disks for additional pagefile and swapfile.
Lawrence
2. We find that using non-local disks for clusters works better if multiple systems have access to the system disk(s). Then if one system file disk server is brought down the cluster can still run. We often use the smaller local disks for additional pagefile and swapfile.
Lawrence
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-25-2005 08:32 AM
04-25-2005 08:32 AM
Re: queues+clustering
Lawrence,
YES!!
And, for continuity, shadowing is your friend!
Proost.
Have one on me.
jpe
YES!!
And, for continuity, shadowing is your friend!
Proost.
Have one on me.
jpe
Don't rust yours pelled jacker to fine doll missed aches.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-04-2005 08:48 AM
05-04-2005 08:48 AM
Re: queues+clustering
Thank you all for the reply.
This is my final analysis for our current setup.
There is a startup (not VMS_startup) file in the sys$common directory which contains generic ques (intialization and execution ques for current 2 nodes) as Joseph and many others mentioned.
So I simply edited the file to include the new node (EV68's execution ques and also setup the name in generic ques to include the execution ques of EV68).
So each node has its own execution queues to which computational tasks are assigned by the generic qeues.
The applications that run automatically gets assigned the tasks to the nodes that are free, (and/or up and running) through these queues.
As time goes I am understanding more and will discuss more but for now my work is accomplished. Please feel free to put in any comments.
Nipun
This is my final analysis for our current setup.
There is a startup (not VMS_startup) file in the sys$common directory which contains generic ques (intialization and execution ques for current 2 nodes) as Joseph and many others mentioned.
So I simply edited the file to include the new node (EV68's execution ques and also setup the name in generic ques to include the execution ques of EV68).
So each node has its own execution queues to which computational tasks are assigned by the generic qeues.
The applications that run automatically gets assigned the tasks to the nodes that are free, (and/or up and running) through these queues.
As time goes I am understanding more and will discuss more but for now my work is accomplished. Please feel free to put in any comments.
Nipun
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-06-2005 06:46 AM
05-06-2005 06:46 AM
Re: queues+clustering
Thanks all of you.
Especially Uwe,Ian and Jan for answering all my posts in perfect details
Nipun
Especially Uwe,Ian and Jan for answering all my posts in perfect details
Nipun
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP