- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Windows Server 2003
- >
- SBS 2003 .. Administrator is NOT supreme??
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-09-2006 10:10 PM
03-09-2006 10:10 PM
I am finding a rather strange effect in that if I try and copy files (logged in as Administrator) from a folder in the D partition say, to My Documents on C, I get file inaccessible .. yet a user can copy at will! Also If I try and see the properties of that file, I'm told I don't have sufficient rights!
Any ideas??
Checking the rights on that folder, I find Administrator has FULL rights and to the subdirectories and files.. Am I missing something here?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-09-2006 11:34 PM
03-09-2006 11:34 PM
Re: SBS 2003 .. Administrator is NOT supreme??
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-10-2006 04:23 AM
03-10-2006 04:23 AM
Re: SBS 2003 .. Administrator is NOT supreme??
Full rights.. as I would expect .. to folder and subfolders and files! Absolutely everything ticked.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-10-2006 05:03 AM
03-10-2006 05:03 AM
SolutionAlso run
whoami /user /groups
Ensure that your account still belongs to the administrators group.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2006 01:46 AM
03-11-2006 01:46 AM
Re: SBS 2003 .. Administrator is NOT supreme??
Try to run a chkdsk for the volume that file belongs to and you'd probably find corrupt files. Just run chkdsk /f and ditto.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-12-2006 06:36 PM
03-12-2006 06:36 PM
Re: SBS 2003 .. Administrator is NOT supreme??
I feel your frustration. I've seen this problem more than once.
Ivan's ideas would have certainly been what I would have tried.
Anyway, Effective Permissions outline by Ivan should show you everything but could you try unclicking 'Allow inheritable permissions from the parent to propagate to this object and all child objects'? and let us know what happens?
Found in file properties->Security tab->Advanced button->Permissions. It's a little checkbox.
This tripped me up from time to time when I started to do Admin work on 2003 servers. it also fixed a lot of problems too.
Good luck.
Rob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2006 12:13 AM
03-20-2006 12:13 AM
Re: SBS 2003 .. Administrator is NOT supreme??
Apologies for the delay in answering.
Ivan, there is definitely something funny about the permissions on the files in that particular folder.. not sure why.. Although I seem (Administrator!) to have full effective rights over the folder and parent folders.. I sometimes get a problem looking at the properties of the files...)
Robert.. 'Allow inheritable permissions from the parent to propagate to this object and all child objects'
If I uncheck on the folder containing the problem file(s) It asks whether to remove all previously granted rights etc.. mightimpact on other users??
So do I keep the original (copy) or delete the inherited rights??
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2006 01:25 AM
03-20-2006 01:25 AM
Re: SBS 2003 .. Administrator is NOT supreme??
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2006 04:33 AM
03-20-2006 04:33 AM
Re: SBS 2003 .. Administrator is NOT supreme??
I always was under the impression that Administrator was the top dog! and didn't need to have folders rights assigned. Might be a peculiarity of SBS2003?.. or server 2003?? I will try a few tests on our own server (Server 2003.. NOT SBS)
Thanks to you all for all your suggestions..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2006 12:16 PM
03-20-2006 12:16 PM
Re: SBS 2003 .. Administrator is NOT supreme??
>>>>
Robert.. 'Allow inheritable permissions from the parent to propagate to this object and all child objects'
If I uncheck on the folder containing the problem file(s) It asks whether to remove all previously granted rights etc.. mightimpact on other users??
So do I keep the original (copy) or delete the inherited rights??
<<<
As you point out there could be an unintended impact so only copy the permissions. With the permissions copied manipulate only 1 or 2 files and test them and note the impact of the change.
It was my experience that you could change permissions all day long but as long as a file/folder inherits rights from the folder above you can end up frustrating yourself to no end. Inheritance is great when you want subfolders to have the same permissions but sometimes you do not.
I believe the solution is close at hand. Administrators do have top level rights. Of course a user can set a file so that only he/see can see it but an admin can always take control when required. This is consistent in WinOS systems.
Try inheritance again and see what happens.
Rob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-07-2006 10:14 AM
04-07-2006 10:14 AM