- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Re: Zone conflict
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-16-2005 03:06 AM
тАО05-16-2005 03:06 AM
Whilst attempting to update zoning configuration, the switch on which I issued cfgEnable threw out a few strange errors, and then rebooted itself.
I've now got the situation where the two switches have got themselves segmented because of a zone conflict.
If I look at the zoning configuration, the configuration which I was trying to enable from F3_SW03 has saved OK onto switch 1, but doesn't appear to have saved on F3_SW03. This will explain the zone conflict message, but whats the best way of getting the two switches talking to each other again ?
Cheers,
Rob
switch1:admin> switchshow
switchName: switch1
switchType: 5.4
switchState: Online
switchMode: Native
switchRole: Principal
switchDomain: 1
switchId: fffc01
switchWwn: 10:00:00:60:69:12:1b:04
switchBeacon: OFF
Zoning: ON (Lyn2_CFG)
port 0: sw Online F-Port 50:00:1f:e1:00:16:2b:41
port 1: sw Online F-Port 50:00:1f:e1:00:16:2b:44
port 2: sw Online F-Port 10:00:00:00:c9:2e:bb:4f
port 3: sw Online F-Port 10:00:00:00:c9:27:cb:b8
port 4: sw No_Light
port 5: sw No_Light
port 6: -- No_Module
port 7: sw Online F-Port 10:00:00:00:c9:34:25:39
port 8: sw No_Light
port 9: sw Online F-Port 50:00:1f:e1:50:02:25:99
port 10: sw Online F-Port 50:00:1f:e1:50:02:25:9c
port 11: sw Online F-Port 10:00:00:00:c9:37:d4:6d
port 12: sw Online F-Port 10:00:00:00:c9:31:b5:81
port 13: sw Online F-Port 50:00:1f:e1:00:1d:ea:41
port 14: sw Online F-Port 50:00:1f:e1:00:1d:ea:44
port 15: sw Online E-Port 10:00:00:60:69:51:9b:b9 (segmented,zone conflict)
F3_SW03:admin> switchshow
switchName: F3_SW03
switchType: 9.2
switchState: Online
switchMode: Native
switchRole: Principal
switchDomain: 3
switchId: fffc03
switchWwn: 10:00:00:60:69:51:9b:b9
switchBeacon: OFF
Zoning: ON (Lyn2_CFG)
port 0: id N2 Online F-Port 50:00:1f:e1:50:02:65:f9
port 1: id N2 Online F-Port 50:00:1f:e1:50:02:65:fc
port 2: id N2 Online F-Port 10:00:00:00:c9:35:83:3f
port 3: id N2 Online F-Port 10:00:00:00:c9:35:d9:c5
port 4: id N2 Online F-Port 21:00:00:e0:8b:0f:10:2f
port 5: id N2 Online F-Port 21:00:00:e0:8b:10:c3:c9
port 6: id N2 Online F-Port 21:00:00:e0:8b:10:4a:c7
port 7: id N2 Online F-Port 21:00:00:e0:8b:11:fe:54
port 8: id N2 Online F-Port 21:00:00:e0:8b:11:85:5a
port 9: id N2 Online F-Port 10:00:00:00:c9:3a:50:c2
port 10: id N2 Online F-Port 21:00:00:e0:8b:10:90:33
port 11: id N2 No_Light
port 12: id N2 No_Light
port 13: id N2 Online F-Port 10:00:00:e0:02:22:66:6c
port 14: id N2 Online F-Port 10:00:00:00:c9:38:b0:a2
port 15: id 1G Online E-Port 10:00:00:60:69:12:1b:04 (segmented,zone conflict)
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-16-2005 03:34 AM
тАО05-16-2005 03:34 AM
Solution1) try to manually update the switch with the old zoning configuration to remove the conflict.
2) remove all initiator ports from the switch with the old config
- cut the ISLs
- disable and clear the zoning configuration
- re-establish the ISL so that it gets a new copy
- put back all initiators
- verify all paths
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-16-2005 05:17 AM
тАО05-16-2005 05:17 AM
Re: Zone conflict
Using option 1, I recreated the missing bits of the configuration and successfully got the configuration enabled on the switch that was out of step.
It then just needed the ISL port to be disabled and re-enabled for the fabric to sort itself out.
Thanks again,
Rob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-25-2009 06:49 AM
тАО02-25-2009 06:49 AM
Re: Zone conflict
The two switches connected together through an ISL via an MPX110 have a segmented, (zone conflict) error. There is no zone config on the switch with the error specified.
I have attached a switchshow.
Regards
Carl
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-25-2009 07:37 AM
тАО02-25-2009 07:37 AM
Re: Zone conflict
SGH-JSY-SSW2 and SGH-JSY-BLSSW2
SGH-JSY-DR-SSW2 and SGH-DR-BLSSW2
Are you trying to connect SGH-JSY-SSW2 and SGH-JSY-DR-SSW2 through port 31?
This will create a single fabric.